It is believed that the new aircraft will be immediately transferred to Jat’s successor, which the Government of Serbia will set up. Earlier this month, the Government said it had delayed the process because of insufficient finances. However, media reports say that the Government has extracted 350 million Dinars from the Belgrade Bypass project budget and this money will be diverted to pay a company which will serve as a privatisation/restructuring advisor for Jat. Therefore, the process of setting up Jat’s successor might speed up yet again.
Comments
Post a Comment
EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.
Is it true that AirVallees flight Rimini-Belgrade will last til August the 1st only?! It's a bit strange, don't you think!?
ReplyDeleteI know this is aviation blog, but Belgrade's need for bypass is far greater than Serbia's need for a new national carrier. Foreign carriers will fill the void immediately if JAT ceased to exist. Cut the losses right away. On the other hand, bypass would be used by hundreds of thousands of vehicles every day and would lure some shipping traffic away from corridor going via Romania and Bulgaria, which are the real money making machine.
ReplyDelete@ anonymous
ReplyDeletei dont think that having JAT disapeer will be the best thing. Once JAT is gone, on most if not all route there will be no competition, so imagine how the prices will go up. Many JAT routes are only served by JAT (DXB, LCA, TLV, GOT, ARN, DUS, TXL, SKP, OHD...)...but i agree, having money go from the Belgrade Bypass is the stupidest thing ever. That is a much needed project that needs to be fixed!
The government should work with JAT for the moment and invest into it, not spend money they dont have!
The Government should create a new company without debts fastest possible.It doesnt cost so much that they had to take money from the tunnel reconstruction project etc.
ReplyDelete