The Croatian Competition Agency has found, following a thorough investigation, that Zagreb Airport did not distort the market or put Ryanair in a privileged position compared to other carriers through its incentive program which resulted in the low cost airline basing three aircraft in the city and launching 24 routes. The growth incentive model, introduced at the end of last year, encourages airlines to commence unserved routes, however, Croatia Airlines has argued it was not offered similar conditions when it was adding new destinations to its Zagreb network prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. The Competition Agency concluded, “The determined discount system used by Zagreb Airport in this model of the incentive scheme has a standardised threshold that applies equally to all interested airlines and as such does not result in the unequal position of airlines, since the discount mechanism is not flexible and is not applied to carriers on an individual basis”.
Zagreb Airport previously noted, “The traffic growth incentive model is designed to reduce the cannibalisation of existing routes (and airlines operating on these routes), while providing maximum market flexibility and ensuring increased traffic in Zagreb. Zagreb Airport is subject to strict regulations defined by the European Commission and the Croatian Civil Aviation Agency. All incentive programs implemented by the incentive model are transparent and non-discriminatory and can be used by all airlines under equal conditions”. Ryanair Group CEO, Michael O'Leary, said, “We are not focusing on routes covered by Croatia Airlines but those that are not served from Zagreb. We plan on carrying over ten million passengers in cooperation with Zagreb Airport over the next five to six years. Croatia Airlines is a distinguished carrier, but it has lost touch with the development of air travel in Croatia, particularly from Zagreb. We do not see them as a competitor because even on the routes we both operate on, we fly to different airports”. Ryanair has three aircraft based in the Croatian capital and its winter destination network is double that of Croatia Airlines, although it still operates significantly fewer flights and offers less capacity.
On the other hand, Croatia Airlines believes it is not being treated equally by its main hub. It previously said, “Competing with a significant number of large carriers has been the reality of the market since Croatia Airlines’ foundation and there is nothing problematic in that regard. However, it is unacceptable that the national carrier is financing the arrival of new carriers on the market”. The company noted that were it offered the same conditions as the low cost giant, its fees at Zagreb Airport would have been reduced by 17.8 million euros in 2019, which would have seen the airline post a profit instead of a loss that year. It added, “We appreciate Zagreb Airport’s efforts in securing new flights, however, this should only be done on the basis of impartiality and the same terms should be offered to all companies without favouritism. At the same time, we expect for Zagreb Airport to meet the needs of Croatia Airlines in the same way and that conditions will be harmonised with those offered to Ryanair, taking into account the number of routes we operate, and passengers carried. Failure to secure the same incentives for Croatia Airlines, or even greater discounts, seriously endangers equal conditions for all and purposely causes damage to the national carrier, which is majority owned by the Republic of Croatia”.
It's completely ludicrous what Croatia Airlines was implying. They can't calculate incentives retroactively for routes launched years ago.
ReplyDeleteEspecially since they still haven't resumed any of those routes launched in the last 5 years.
DeleteAnd they can get incentives too if they actually launched some new routes.
DeleteInterestingly, Croatia Airlines couldn't benefit these incentives even if Zagreb Airport accepts to apply it retroactively, and even to the existing routes. There is no single year Croatia Airlines managed to grow more than 150.000 passengers (arrival and departure) since the airport is under the concession, which is the main criteria for the incentives.
DeleteIf that is one of the criteria that it definitely is geared towards LCCs.
DeleteWell the whole point was to attract an LCC. There is no other way for them to come other than through hefty discounts.
DeleteI really see no issue in the incentive program. Croatia Airlines just can't deal with the extra competition.
ReplyDeleteWell at least they didn't suspend ten routes over the next month just months after launching them.
DeleteThey did. And not on period for 2 weeks but forever. Tel Aviv, Lisbon, Prague, Milan, Helsinki, Bucharest, Oslo, Stockholm, Saint Petersburg.
DeleteAnd before that, long ago, they also suspended Moscow, Istanbul, Madrid, Budapest, Bratislava, Berlin, Hamburg, Stuttgart, Dusseldorf, Manchester, Tirana. Most of these are lucrative, profitable, good load and good yield services, but hey, how else LH would be fed.
DeleteAt least BCN is coming back
Deletehttps://www.exyuaviation.com/2021/12/croatia-airlines-to-restore-barcelona.html
BCN might be back, but not for long, for sure. After OU reopening BCN, FR will go for either Girona or Reus in the next round,and probably make them withdraw. In my opinion it would be wiser if they went for MAD, where there is single airport and no incentives for FR, and with IB having much more expensive tickets than FR. But BCG probably knows better...
DeleteWhy didn't the airport launch these discounts earlier?
ReplyDeleteBecause their revenue was good, which is obviously not the case anymore because of corona.
DeleteI don't understand that OU didn't see this coming. I mean in general, it must have known that some LCC would sooner or later start flights or base a plane.
ReplyDeleteI would hope this incentive program results in attracting more new airlines and not just Ryanair. Has any new airline announced flights to ZAG other than the Russian vaccine flights?
ReplyDeleteI think EW did but terminated the plans due to weak bookings. I think Berlin was one of them.
DeleteFinnair is a new arrival.
DeleteNow we await to see how EU commission will rule on Ryanair complaint about state aid to OU.
ReplyDeleteThe one negative side for Croatia Airlines is that if it gets any more aid, Ryanair will be quick to reports them to the EU, as they have been doing with many airlines recently.
DeleteStill waiting for traffic to boom with Ryanair.
ReplyDeleteFR will be flying to almost 40 destinations in the summer from ZAG!
DeleteTraffic boom will be felt next year.
DeleteGoogle "Covid-19 pandemic"
Delete
DeleteYesterday 5.958 new cases.
What I find unfortunate is that both easy jet and Wizz Air used to fly to Zagreb but not anymore. Hope they come back with these incentives.
ReplyDeleteI wonder at what cost Ryanair came. Not just for Croatia Airlines but for the airport too.
ReplyDeleteLaudamotion (ie Ryanair) wanted to open a base in Zagreb 2 years ago. Croatia Airlines lobbied and blocked them.
ReplyDeleteCroatia Airlines really should start working on a market response to Ryanair. Even though 6 months have already passed since FR launched flights to Zagreb.
ReplyDeleteToo early to respond
DeleteDidn't they first say they would adapt to market conditions?
DeleteDon't worry, BCG is preparing strategy LOL
DeleteSeems like a smart programme.
ReplyDeleteWell great news for Zagreb. Who cares what OU thinks.
ReplyDeleteBravo Hrvatska!
ReplyDeleteThis time I agree. Some 20 years late, but better late than never
DeleteWell Croatia Airlines is right. Why should Ryanair get better terms than Croatia Airlines which has been flying from there for over 25 years and even flew during the pandemic when many airlines grounded all their planes?
ReplyDeleteOU has same terms if it launched new routes. But you can't apply this policy to routes in the past. Then every airline flying to Zagreb could ask for them.
DeleteRyanair got better terms only for opening new routes this year.
DeleteThey can open new routes and get incentives for them, just like FR did.
DeleteSo you consider Sandefjord and Charleroi new routes?
DeleteEvery time some LCC comes to Zagreb they launch exactly the same campaign. Glad the competition agency stepped in.
ReplyDeleteYes I remember they did the same when easyJet launched flights. Lucky for them they left.
DeleteIn fact it was Croatia Airlines which triggered this investigation by publicly blaming a private company doing illegal business. I wonder if the airport brought this issue to the court.
DeleteI love how in the end they mention they are owned by the government :D just to remind ZAG who they are messing with.
ReplyDeleteCry me a river Croatia Airlines
ReplyDeleteAnd what exactly are they going to do if ZAG does not give them the same conditions, which I doubt they will? Nothing.
ReplyDeleteOh their majority owner can do plenty. There is a reason they mentioned them.
DeleteThey can't do anything after this investigation by the competition agency.
DeleteI believe that major airports like ZAG should support their national airlines and give them more favorable terms and conditions than to foreign/low cost carriers.
ReplyDeleteWhy?
DeleteSo they could do next to nothing for years to come.
DeleteI'm glad Zagreb finally has a proactive management that has identified clearly what they have to do.
ReplyDeleteI wonder would they have gone down this path was there no corona.
DeleteProbably not
DeleteZAIC finally applied pressure on OU management, which was a logical and expected move.
DeleteIs this the work of the French or tactics changes when TAV took on a greater role?
DeleteCroatia Airlines will not fail.
ReplyDeleteWell they failed with their attempt to accuse the airport of playing favorites.
DeleteBasically OU is crying and screaming but on the other hand willing to do nothing for Zag.
ReplyDeleteThey only provide them with over 50% of passengers.
DeleteAs far as I can see, ZAG has published its incentive program on its web page and Croatia Airlines is free to apply for it too.
ReplyDeleteExactly
DeleteIn my opinion, if Wizz opens a base in Zagreb, it will not be so difficult. For example, Sofia has Wizz (34 destinations), Ryanair (38), Bulgaria Air (25), that's a lot, but FB is still alive!
ReplyDeleteOU has a good network in my opinion!
Why do they complain?
ReplyDeleteBecause it is easier to complain, than to actually do something.
DeleteTime to quit complaining. I don't know a EU airline that has been so well protected at their main base for so long.
ReplyDeleteMany have
DeleteSuch as?
DeleteWhy OU didn't make the most of it of having little LCC competition at its main base up until now is a good question.
DeleteIn my opinion, if Wizz opens a base in Zagreb, it will not be so difficult. For example, Sofia has Wizz (34 destinations), Ryanair (38), Bulgaria Air (25), that's a lot, but FB is still alive!
ReplyDeleteOU has a good network in my opinion!
But can Wizz find the destinations that are not served?
Delete^ Yes, in my opinion there is enough demand as in Sofia.
DeleteIn general, Sofia and Zagreb do not differ much in terms of traffic.
Wizz can fly the routes of FR, OU.
Zagreb have big potential! As SOF,BEG,OTP!
You're still lacking: MAD, BCN, PMI, CTA, EDI, LIS, WAW, OTP, CLJ and of course the domestic market. So, yes. There is room for Wizzair.
DeleteI didn't mean to say there is no demand, I just wasn't sure if there are destinations they can launch to meet incentive model. But I agree with your list of routes in general. In any case would be good if they came.
DeleteYou snooze you loose
ReplyDeleteGood now we can move on and Croatia Airlines really needs to focus on competing against FR.
ReplyDeleteLCCs are a fact of life now in every part of the world, and their contribution cannot be underestimated. Time for OU to get used to that.
ReplyDeleteWell I guess OU has launched around 8 new routes since 2016 and they didn't receive the same treatment as FR in terms of discounts.
DeleteUsually, Michael O'Leary is a smart dude. When he projects up to 10 million Ryanair passengers during the upcoming 10 years, I don't think he's joking. Look at sleepy Bratislava and how they grew there. Also Charleroi is a very good example or the 2nd Warsaw Airport - Modlin.
ReplyDeleteOU like every other airline will need restructuring its fares, fleet and focus on deploying bigger aircraft on competitive and busier routes. They can continue feeding Lufthansa, but they also should consider O&D traffic, charters to warmer destinations in winter and also why not basing an aircraft in LJU. They just need to move on and act faster because once those big LCC boys arrive, they get really aggressive and hungry for passengers.
Agree 100% I just think that OU should have started this restructuring 6 months ago because they are wasting precious time.
DeleteIt was kind of clear that they were not playing favourites.
ReplyDeleteWell it's questionable when the incentive model states you have do add 150.000+ passengers per year. They are well aware OU can't do that.
DeleteBut doesn't ZAG have some discounts for airlines based on the overall volume of traffic and passengers they handle each year? Considering OU is the largest they would probably get some discounts. Most airport do it this way.
DeleteCroatia Airlines isn't actually making an issue that Ryanair will be flying from Zagreb. What they have an issue with is that it is getting much better terms at the airport than they are and Croatia Airlines is by far the biggest airline in Zagreb.
ReplyDeleteOU should have started some new regional routes like Podgorica, Tirana and Pristina.
ReplyDeleteOU is not competitive to capture the post covid market.
DeleteGood luck to OU, FR and ZAG. I'm certain all three can coexist and function besides each other.
ReplyDeleteOU has a big battle on its hands.
DeleteSurprise surprise
ReplyDeleteTough. You can't apply discounts retroactively. Market conditions change. The world today is not the same it was between 2016 and 2019.
ReplyDeleteThis is ridiculous. You bring a new airline to the airport and now the other airline which has been receiving millions over the years wants more money.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you people think should be OU's strategy now to try and compete against Ryanair? Do you think FR really poses that much of a threat to them?
ReplyDeleteMy first suggestion would be to replace the management.
DeleteIn my opinion they should have focused on connecting the region with western Europe long ago. This would be a good source of passengers and helped them be less affected by Ryanair's arrival.
DeleteAlso, why not launch something like Croatia Airlines Holidays, offering holiday packs to Croatia on Western European markets and organizing charters so you can better compete on the coast.
DeleteThey should have established a base in LJU with one Q400. Could have been successful. There is still time.
DeleteToo close to ZAG...
DeleteGlad ZAG did not give in to OU's pressure.
ReplyDeleteI can only imagine what will happen if Wizz Air comes to ZAG.
ReplyDeleteHope all issues are now resolved.
ReplyDeleteLet's see how things turn out. I wish Ryanair good luck but despite all focus being on OU, I don't think Ryan will have it easy on some routes either.
ReplyDeleteI was flying several times with Ryanair - not here in the ex-Yu space, but there was not a single flight where there was no problem and harsh words exchanged between the passengers and the crew (either at the airport or in a plane). I'd like to find an initiative to ban the Ryanair which is a liberal issue not carrying either about the crew or passengers - just sitting there for making money with the least of expenses.
ReplyDelete