The European General Court has dismissed Ryanair’s case against the European Commission’s decision in 2020 to approve 11.7 million euros in state aid to Croatia Airlines aimed at compensating the carrier for losses incurred as a result of the coronavirus outbreak and travel restrictions introduced by Croatia and other countries to limit the spread of the virus in the period between March 19, 2020, and June 30, 2020. The low cost airline had argued that EU regulators should have opened an investigation before approving the state support. In the ruling issued yesterday, the judges of the Luxembourg-based General Court dismissed the case in its entirety.
Ryanair put forward four arguments against the state aid, including that it distorted the market. It argued that at the time the aid was granted, Ryanair was the fourth largest airline in Croatia with a 7% market share, whereas Croatia Airlines had a 29% share. It also claimed to have been the only real challenger of Croatia Airlines’ market position. The judgment notes, “The applicant [Ryanair] also claims that its losses in Croatia due to the Covid‑19 pandemic are ‘catastrophic’ and that, unlike Croatia Airlines, it does not benefit from any grant helping it to cushion the impact and to resume its activities in Croatia when travel restrictions are lifted. The applicant also submits that it recently ordered 210 Boeing 737 Max aircraft which joined its fleet at the beginning of 2021 and that, as a result of the 4% increase in seats and the 16% reduction in fuel consumption, it will be able to offer more routes and create new jobs in Croatia while significantly lowering its environmental footprint, assuming that it is able to compete fairly with heavily subsidised competitors like the beneficiary of the aid at issue. The applicant maintains that the direct corollary of closeness of competition vis-à-vis Croatia Airlines is that its competitive situation has been significantly affected by the aid measure at issue”.
The judgment further notes, “The documents before the Court do not support the applicant’s claim that it is the main competitor of the beneficiary of the aid at issue. In particular, the file shows that the applicant held the fourth place on the Croatian market in terms of market shares in 2019. Furthermore, it is apparent from that the beneficiary of the aid at issue serves 38 destinations in 24 European countries. It is apparent from the documents before the Court that the applicant was in competition with that beneficiary only on two routes, that is to say between Pula and Frankfurt and between Zadar and Frankfurt. Competition between those two airlines thus appears to be limited”. It added, “The applicant’s other arguments are inadequately substantiated, with the result that it is not in a position to demonstrate that the aid at issue is liable to have a substantial adverse effect on its market position. Its line of argument is based, in reality, on the mere fact that it is a competitor of Croatia Airlines and that, unlike Croatia Airlines, it does not benefit from aid granted by the Croatian State, which constitutes a competitive disadvantage for the applicant. Such a general line of argument is not sufficient to demonstrate that the applicant’s market position was substantially affected”.
The ruling revealed that in addition to the 11.7 million euros Croatia Airlines received for the March to June period in 2020, it was also granted a further 79.7 million euros in aid linked to the pandemic that same year, however, the court noted that Ryanair was not contesting that sum, focusing instead on the 11.7 million euros. The court also rejected the argument by the Croatian State, which tried to prove that Ryanair is not Croatia Airlines’ direct competitor. “In the present case, it is apparent from the documents before the Court that the applicant is active on the Croatian air transport market and that it is a competitor of the beneficiary of the aid at issue”, the Court said. All sides in the case, including Ryanair, the European Commission and the Croatian government conceded that Croatia Airlines has been facing significant financial issues for years.
Ryanair and the Croatian government have been ordered to pay their own court costs. The budget airline is also obligated to cover the court costs incurred by the European Commission.
Good!
ReplyDeleteThere is first time for everything, so:
DeleteBravo Hrvatska!!!!!!!!
Two sides of the same coin. Just the scale is different.
DeleteBravo Croatia Airlines
DeleteGo to say Ryanair's arguments were pretty weak and general.
ReplyDeleteEspecially where they claim that giving aid to OU had a "catastrophic" impact on their financial results in Croatia and 2 months later they open a base in Zagreb and launch 25 routes.
DeleteIn my opinion, they are probably not happy with their financial results in Zagreb. That's why we haven't seen the 5 based aircraft and 70 routes they were originally announcing.
DeleteActually they said they wanted to have 10 aircraft based in Zagreb.
DeleteWhy does the Croatian government have to cover its own court costs while Ryanair covers the costs of the European Commission?
ReplyDeleteTaxpayers will cover it. We can add that onto the OU aid fund.
DeleteIt does seem odd. Maybe because the court rejected the government's line of argument?
DeleteHow much are the court costs?
DeleteNever understood why they went after such a small sum of aid when OU received over 100 million later on.
ReplyDeleteSo much aid, yet so little to show for it.
DeleteHad they won this case, they might have challenged the rest of the aid. Now there is little chance.
DeleteExactly. Not going to happen, because the same EU methodology was used to grant the rest of the aid to OU.
DeleteExpected
ReplyDeleteWin or loose, FR will be breathing down their neck about all sort of aid.
ReplyDeleteNot really. Croatia Airlines has already received a lot of aid since then. Croatia Airlines also really isn't a major factor for them. Look how they retreated from Zagreb. Next year will be the third year that they haven't introduced a single new route from their main base.
DeleteI don't see how OU can survive in the long term with Ryanair on its back all the time.
DeleteDon't worry anonymous 09:17, Ryanair will be gone for good before long!
DeleteThank god
ReplyDeleteBut the Croatian government's argument that Ryanair isn't a competitor to Croatia Airlines... Seriously?
ReplyDeleteRyanair and OU attract two completely different markets!
DeleteFR lost as expected
ReplyDeleteLooking forward, there are no possibilities according to EU law for OU to receive state aid. They are making losses all the time, and the state is not allowed to cover them.
Their future does not look very bright to me.
Happy the bullies didn't win!
ReplyDeleteTo me the bigger issue is that the money they got was not used properly.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteAnd it will not be properly used for as long as both Croatia and OU are run and controlled by pravomocno osudjena zlocinacka organizacija Kradeze
DeleteNothing changed when they were being run by the other party for several years either.
DeleteExactly, back then one of the worst traffic and transport minsters of all time. Had absolutely no idea about air traffic and was responsible for the very bad contract for the new zagreb airport
DeleteNothing changed, true, there was not enough time to cut all octopussy arms, there were more important fires around to extinguish, and finally other party does not have final verdict to be criminal organization. But I understand it took one minute to advocate Kradeze in response to my post. It says everything.
Delete"not enough time", of course! What important tasks has the responsible minister dealt with? Reform of the railway HŽ, Jadrolinija, Hrvatske Ceste,...? I can not remember any big change.
Deletein Dalmacija we say: isti k..., drugo pakovanje
DeleteIt's not isti k... drugo pakovanje. Kradeze organized Croatia to use it as its own ATM. Kradeze is the only party with final verdict to be criminal organization. I agree non-Kradeze gvt didn't do much about OU, and many other things, but let's just remember "branitelji" orchestrated by Kradeze threatening with gas cylinders, in order to stop changes. Are others doing things like that when Kradeze is officially on power? Isn't that the best proof who they are and how they operate? It's far far far away from being isti k..., drugo pakovanje
DeleteExcellent, fXck off O'liery!
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteCroatia Airlines is here to stay!
ReplyDeleteLet's wait and see.
DeleteOU's business model relies on state aid.
DeleteNoons wants more than me that OU stays here. The problem is it is not company we can be satisfied with and proud of. It is small, insignificant, stuck in the past, overstuffed, mismanaged, loss making, full of crime, corruption, nepotism and incompetence, it's inert and slow, it has lost all chances and opportunities to grow and become much better. And you are right, Croatia Airlines will probably be here to stay for a long time, the only oroblem is that OU as it is now does not deserve to exist
DeleteNo one, not noons, autocorrect
DeletePozdrav, it's so good to hear that deep down you want OU to stay!
Delete@An.18.37, both deep down and shallow up I want OU to stay, but big, strong and efficient, not weak, tiny and inert. That's why I write, because Croatia has potentials for much more. Sorry you don't understand that.
DeleteRyanair in Zagreb seems desperate.
ReplyDeleteThey have 25 routes and 3 planes in ZAG. Think they are doing just fine.
DeleteI honestly didn't expect that. So first time in a few years. Bravo Hrvatska!
ReplyDeleteWhat would have the repercussions been for OU if the court ruled in Ryanair's flavor?
ReplyDeleteThe government would have had to pay back the aid and it would probably be very difficult for OU to get more aid. Also the other aid they received may have been contested. So this is a very good outcome for OU.
DeleteOU would have to pay back the aid to the government, which they can't, and it would end up in a bankruptcy.
DeleteI am glad it ended this way but something drastic needs to change at this company. The last time they were given huge amounts of money they had to restructure and in my opinion it was a complete failure because the restructuring didn't lead to a healthier business.
ReplyDeleteReplacement of the management should be a priority.
Delete^ Five years too late.
DeleteManagement makes no difference because the government would just put in charge someone equally as clueless.
DeleteExactly
DeleteI didn't like Croatia Airlines' chances so this is a relief. .
ReplyDeleteFinally the case is over. Good result!
ReplyDeleteall governments across the world are saving their airlines. I don't know what FR is on.
ReplyDeleteCroatian government is constantly saving OU. Corona or no corona.
DeleteThey don't like their competition being kept on state life-aid forever and ever, while themselves have to fight for every cent on the market, I would imagine.
DeleteI wonder if this will provoke some kind of a response from Ryanair in Zagreb. Like the launch of new routes to destroy OU there or something like that?
ReplyDeleteRyanair looks only at its bottom line. They will only launch new routes if they can make money.
DeleteRyanair will retreat before long and con some other Airport instead!
DeleteHappy Ryanair lost!
ReplyDeleteBravo Croatia Airlines
ReplyDeleteRyanair lost almost all cases it launched against the European Commission approving Covid aid to airlines, so no surprise really.
ReplyDeleteThey actually won several but they did loose most.
DeleteCongratulations
ReplyDeleteWell that's the end of that chapter. Now, if Ryanair really wants to defeat Croatia Airlines, they should do it on the market.
ReplyDeleteThey already have. Look at how many routes they fly from Zagreb this winter and how many Croatia Airlines has.
DeleteOn which market? The one where OU is able to sell the tickets by dumping the prices, since they are operating with a perpetual loss?
DeleteBravo Hrvatska!
ReplyDeleteNo comment
DeleteIt's a tough day for pozdrav.
DeleteMessage for uhljebs : nicija nije gorjela do zore. And it's normal day for pozdrav who is just normally sad and disappointed about humiliated servant and pathetic feeder. Today's article and recent Court ruling will not change it. Nothing new.
DeleteHello Pozdrav iz Uhljeb! You must be very disappointed today!
DeleteCroatia Airlines dodged a bullet.
ReplyDeleteUntil the next case...
DeleteOU is no longer protected like a polar bear. I would be worried if I was them.
DeleteHallelujah.
ReplyDeleteNot unexpected
ReplyDeleteI knew they would dismiss Ryanair's case but what it shows is that it will be much harder to hand aid to Croatia Airlines in the future.
ReplyDeleteThere will always be PSO funding.
DeleteIt is far from being enough for them
DeleteRyanair could have applied for the PSO funding if it wanted to do.
DeleteAnd do what, fly OSI-ZAG with A320?
DeleteThey don't have to apply for all routes. They could apply just for ZAG-DBV and ZAG-SPU.
DeleteGood luck OU
ReplyDeleteSoo many of their appeals filed like against TAP, SAS, LH, Condor and now Croatia Airlines.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much money they lost launching these stupid lawsuits.
DeleteUnfortunately, not enough to see these crooks get bankrupt. All they are doing is to hog every market they enter, and most people still don't seem to get it and never will, as long as they remain obscenely cheap .
DeleteSo much for the sustainability bullsh… yeah
Are there any conditions for all this aid for OU?
ReplyDeleteNo
DeleteMost government have put conditions to the aid they offered to airlines.
DeleteKey statement:
ReplyDeleteAll sides in the case, including Ryanair, the European Commission and the Croatian government conceded that Croatia Airlines has been facing significant financial issues for years.
So? Other airlines in the region as well. This case proves limited government subsidies as long as they are done in controlled way, are legal in EU (and for airlines outside of EU).
DeleteThe case doesn't prove that. The case is only in relation to subsidies that were meant to cover Covid losses. OU gets help all the time be there covid or no covid.
DeleteBravo OU! That will teach Ryanair, claiming to be innocent. In reality it's Ryanair who rely on subsidies to stay in business. Ryanair need suing for not refunding cancelled flights during the pandemic. The sooner Ryanair goes Bankrupt the better for global Aviation! Bravo Hrvatska and long live OU, long live Air Serbia, Long love Air Montenegro and all flag carriers!
ReplyDeleteTotally agree with you :) but nothing will teach ryanair until they get busted .
Delete... it's a shame that the crooks let Adria get looted and sunk before
Ryanair? Bankrupt? Joke of the day.
DeleteIf I was Ryanair I wouldn't be boasting about ordering 210 flying coffins!
ReplyDeleteSimply, great news. As a Brit who for 5 years struggled to fly between Croatia and the UK throughout the whole year at affordable prices, I am a great fan of Croatia Airlines. Bravo Vatreni!
ReplyDeleteEuropean Union is one big "uhljebistan" when it comes to the national airlines and national companies in general... so this decision is not surprising at all!
ReplyDelete