Network, fleet and funding strategy for Slovenia’s flag carrier presented


The companies Melkom and Fabce, which were commissioned by the Slovenian Ministry for Infrastructure to undertake a study on ways to improve the country’s air connectivity have presented their findings which show that launching a new flag carrier could be economically viable. The study acknowledged that the state of the Slovenian aviation sector is currently one of the worst in Europe, while short-term forecasts are also unfavourable, with the number of flights in the next eight weeks expected to stand at approximately the same level as last year despite new carriers launching services to Ljubljana. According to the study, at least 300.000 passengers from Slovenia are using alternative airports outside of the country for their travels.

The study suggests a new national carrier should be established by selecting one of four models: services through an ACMI operator, dry-leasing aircraft, acquiring aircraft or a Public Private Partnership (PPP) between the state and a private entity. The experts concluded that a PPP would be the most desirable option. Furthermore, they determined the carrier should either operate CRJ900 or E175 jets. Alternatively, it could opt for a larger-capacity fleet with the Airbus A220s or the E195s. In terms of network development, the study proposes either eleven destinations with sixty weekly flights operated by a three-member fleet, which would include Brussels (eleven weekly), Frankfurt, Skopje, Pristina and Munich (all daily), Zurich (six weekly), Vienna (four weekly), Amsterdam, Copenhagen and Berlin (all three weekly), as well as Athens (two weekly). Alternatively, it has suggested a network with twelve destinations and 61 weekly frequencies, which would include Madrid and Stockholm (both three weekly) but exclude Munich and see an extra rotation to Copenhagen for a total of four per week.

Proposed network for Slovenia's new national carrier

The study found that in case of a PPP, the national airline would break-even in its seventh year of operations. The cumulative loss in such a case would reach 35 million euros in the sixth year, and after the tenth year it would amount to 28 million euros. The authors of the study estimated the private partner would have to make an initial capital injection of at least 35 million euros, or seventy million euros in the case of a more ambitious network. According to the study, if both the state and the private partner invested fifty million euros each, the airline would be profitable within ten years. The study further points out that in order for the airline to become profitable, it would have to have an average cabin load factor of 64%, while its fares would have to amount to at least 134 euros. It further stressed the new airline would have to be lean, commercially successful and, at least initially, conservative in its business model.

A separate interdepartmental government taskforce has also found that a national airline, established through a Public Private Partnership, would be the best solution to improving Slovenia’s air connectivity woes in the mid- to long-term. Tanja Šarabon from the Ministry for Infrastructure, who also heads the taskforce, said the Ministry has proposed to initiate procedures for establishing a national carrier as soon as possible. On the other hand, the Minister for Infrastructure, Alenka Bratušek, said if the government adopts the proposed decision to establish a new flag carrier, the airline could launch operations in the summer of 2025 under a "very optimistic scenario".



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    2025 ?! Lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      I agree..the question who is or are the real owner(s) of the airport and is it merely a tax evasion for other enterprises..it won't work....

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:04

    Nice network but maybe will don't see this ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are searching for company which is ready to share loss of 35 mil euros in few years?

      And according to this "strategy" loss will decline to 28mil in six years if everything goes according to this "plan"?

      I do not believe they will find any serious operator willing to participate in this adventure.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:23

      Will don't???

      Delete
    3. Slav.Man11:48

      I hope it works out for them. But breaking into the business is harder and harder every year.

      I thought the best option would be for them to join together with another airline like the others did Iberia/BA/ Air Lingus. or KLM/Air france.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:04

    Things are finally moving in the right direction, but why will it take until 2025 under "very optimistic scenario" to launch??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Because they need to find a strategic partner and they need to get EU approval.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:07

      I still think that could be done by summer 24.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:11

      I think she wrongly said 2025 instead of 2024,especially as all projections were done from 1.11.2024 on

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:22

      Slovenian CAA will need at least two years to check all the manuals/procedures, approve postholders and issue an AOC. It would be faster to try and buy an external AOC but having an AOC and aircraft registered outside of Slovenia is laughable for a national carrier.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:26

      ITA would like to have a word

      Delete
    6. Anonymous10:38

      ITA is a laughable airline, which just proves the point.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous11:46

      What a waste of money! Most of these routes are already operating. Now Air Slovenistan is going to come and just take over. No new passengers are going to be generated from this. They are saying 300k people are leaving for foreign airports? They really don't have any idea what they are talking about. I really feel sorry for Slovenia for having such poor leadership. Ryanair is now flying to Pardubice yet we are going to have Air Slovenistan. How fortunate are we! Thank you, Venice, for being there for us.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous12:06

      stopped reading after Air Slovenistan ...

      Delete
    9. Anonymous12:09

      Enjoy in Venice, and we will enjoy flying with Air Slovenia. Finally some good news :)

      Delete
    10. I do not believe thy will find someone who is ready to loose tens of milions in Air Slovenia. Better to try to tals with Ryanair and Wizz air. Will cost leess and routes will be launched sooner.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:05

    Again only talkings and ideas not real plans....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous09:05

    "while short-term forecasts are also unfavourable, with the number of flights in the next eight weeks expected to stand at approximately the same level as last year despite new carriers launching services to Ljubljana. "

    This does not sound good. Fully support the establishment of a new national carrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      It does not sound good because it is wrong. There has been almost 50% growth in passenger numbers and flights since last year. But of course when you are the government, you have to skew reality to sell your ideas...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:29

      Lol...50% growth :) compare this year number to 2019 please...

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:41

      ... and this information is related to the NEXT 8 weeks, not previous months...

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:06

    Till 2025 other airlines will take all flights and destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      Great, the new carrier will not be needed in that case.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:09

      In 2025 all other airports will be on +50% conpared to pre-covid and we wont be even on 100%. National carrier is more than needed!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:10

      For what ? For transfers, Albania is the fastest growing market in Europe, Kosovo also, SJJ will get new airline with base, SKP have more new subsidized routes...

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:23

      Let's start for people departing/arriving from/to Slovenia. Now we don't have even that..

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:09

      @11.10 SKP's "subsidized" routes are for 7 euro per pax and not unlimited. Calculate what the others are paying

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:06

    Network makes sense but only if Lufthansa group stopped their own flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:30

      That network won't be possible with 3 aircrafts...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:59

      Air Montenegro do it with 2 planes. Slovenia can start with the same

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:22

      Of course they can start, but not with such network. To many routes for such small amount of aircrafts :)

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:04

      4 aircraft will be needed for that at least. And Embraer E190/95 would be a perfect fit.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:07

    So basically fly to the destinations already served so the likes of LH group pull out of LJU

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous09:07

    "while its fares would have to amount to at least 134 euros."

    Exactly why I don't support an overpriced airline like the one we had before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      Currently tickets to amsterdam with transavia are selling for 200e,flights to FRA are well over 400e (one way) not to mention CDG where tickets are costing upwards of 600s

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:15

      ^ true. Tickets are currently anything but cheap and there is very little LCC presence (less than during Adria times)

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:19

      For me this month (june) it will be cheaper to lease private driver for meetings in Frankfurt

      I don't think i jeed to add anything

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:20

      * need

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:31

      FRA has all flights closed to higher RBD (Y cls). Even for flights much in advance..

      Delete
    6. Anonymous12:44

      True, but only for intra-Europe tickets. They are fully open for connections to long haul flights. It is very obvious which passengers they are interest to.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:08

    This year or next we will see full p2p resumption?! 2025 the market will be fully acquired by LH Group and other airlines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      while short-term forecasts are also unfavourable, with the number of flights in the next eight weeks expected to stand at approximately the same level as last year despite new carriers launching services to Ljubljana



      Lol are you sure?

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:09

    New LH subsidiary !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:19

      SLO definitely needs and Slovenian airline, not an LH subsidiary. Repeating the same model as Adria had will yield the same results at the end - loses and bankruptcy.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:23

      I don't know why you concluded this would be an LH subsidiary.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:33

      And what was wrong with Adria model? Slovenia had connectivity, passengers..only mistake was to sell JP to 4k.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:11

    If this new airline is to be government funded and run, will ticket fares be subsidized?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      They talked about pre-funding it from the start and letting it run

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:16

      So market prices for tickets?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:27

      That's the way state sponsored capitalism works.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09:15

    Investing 35-100mil EUR into LH subsidiary is not a wise business move

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      it is not a LH subsidiary.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:15

    Long process but I do think she was just being cautious and it is likely the airline will be ready beforehand. We will see.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous09:16

    It is not as much money as I thought it would be

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous09:16

    If LH is somehow involved it will get a green light from the EU without issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:20

      If new airline acts as a feeder for LH it will have the same destiny as Adria

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:24

      I'll be ok with this new airline as log as there are no flights to LH hubs.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:26

      * long

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:35

      And you know that's not going to happen.

      Delete
  17. Anonymous09:17

    Depends on how quickly they find a partner. Amelia is looking more and more likely (especially as e-jet is mentioned, and the type rating switch is easy to do from e-135/45)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous09:28

    Finally there are some serious plans for a new national airline. Good luck and hope this ends well.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous09:29

    It would be good if the private partner is a Slovenian airline, so Solinair or Amelia. Of course I would prefer Amelia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      Is it realistic that either of these two would be interested?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:36

      Solinair already presented plans for new national airline 3 years ago

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:39

      Solinair is 80% owned by a Turkish company MNG airlines.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous09:30

    A220 definitely not needed (especially with all the issues they are having). E195s would be the best option in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous09:36

    So why didn't the government accept Solinair's offer several years ago which was more or less almost the same as the proposal made now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:40

      Different government, different priorities

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:42

      Also should be taken into account that the aviation industry was in a state of collapse at the time because of Covid and recovery wasn't expected for years and years.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:42

      Actually Solinair said Covid was a big advantage for them to set up an airline at the time. They were right.

      Delete
  22. JU520 BEGLAX09:41

    It will not happen as it is nonsense. No private investor will waste his money for a guaranteed loss maker and EU wont allow government funds. If todays political class has an idea, it is mostly BS. Or do u still hear politicians talking sense? Lets focus on realistic scenarios and not waste time on politicians and all their BS talk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:50

      Well it was actually an analytics company that did this study. Not politicians.

      Delete
    2. JU520 BEGLAX10:21

      If a company does a study for the government u know how it usually ends, especially in our region where ties between politics and such companies can be very close.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:25

      Analytics company partly owned by a politican Jože P. Damijan - this tells you everything about the credibility of the study.

      Delete
    4. It is BS.Absolutely the same BS as Croatia Airlines and BCG analytics and consultance.Tailored money laundry

      Delete
  23. Anonymous09:50

    I fully belive that there will be a lot of airlines who will be interested in the proposal namely:
    Amelia, Solinair, Cityjet, maybe even Aegan and Turkish (Turkish has Albania air and Aegan Animawimgs)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:02

      I hope so but I fear it will be like the interest for the subsidies.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:03

      I'm pretty sure talks are already ongoing, otherwise they wouldn't be so confident

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:33

      I hope it’s Aegean or Turkish that would be way more professional

      Delete
  24. Anonymous10:02

    Should have all been done in 2019.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      We were being told that the market will take care of itself and that everything will be great and dandy without Adria.

      Delete
  25. Anonymous10:25

    I don’t see Skopje and Pristina as daily. Why? LJU will never again be the hub between Balkans and Western Europe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:39

      I don't agree with that, there is still more than enough demand to carry transfers as well.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:05

      Since the collpase of Adria, Air Serbia increased their operations to Skopje, Lufthansa launched 10 weekly rotations, Pegasus increased, plus we have daily to Warsaw and double daily to Istanbul and Vienna. And the only reasonable route this new slovenian carrier will offer is AMS, and i am sure there is more then enough carriers whichs offer connceting flights to AMS from SKP. Not to mention that Wizz Air will have daily flights to Eindhoven and Brussele, as well as 10 weekly to Dortmund, plus four weekly to Cologne and three weekly to Luxembourg. This is more then enough. Also, till 2025 maybe we will get AMS flights. So, daily flights by this airline and three weekly by Wizz ( which until then can be increased on four ) are not needed between SKP and LJU.

      Delete
    3. and yet 1 week after Wizz scheduled 3 rotations weekly, price per ticket increased from 23€ to 80€ on most of the flights

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:15

      But, also from ZRH to PRN you had 10 departures per day and still you could get plenty of transfers via LJU. Then you have CPH, FRA, MUC.. those are all strong ethnic destinations.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:16

      @11.05 what a nonsence coveku! So lets forbid every other airine to start flights to Skopje then? All legacies at SKP are expanding despite Wizz opening new routes. Its a parallel market. Must be very limited to think a daily CR9 couldnt be filled with transfer pax to ZRH and the likes ...

      Delete
    6. Anonymous15:09

      Also we have 10 weekly flights to Zurich from Skopje with A320s. We have direct flight to FRA as well to CPH, VIE and BER. And for Munich, if anybody dont want to use W6, i am sure there is enough options to choose for connceting flight.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous18:11

      just lol

      Delete
  26. notLufthansa11:33

    I am yet to see the study itself, but from what I heard from people attending its govt presentation it is bs. It is based on data and situation from 4 years ago, not taking into account current developments and state and there was no study into why Adria went downhill. And all that with support of people, who actually pushed or helped pushing it into abyss....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:06

      Of course it's bs, but at least they did something for start, otherwise we would stay at same spot for several years. At least they start moving now...
      And regarding reasons for Adria bankruptcy.. If you will give this task to 10 different people, you will also get 10 different reasons why JP went bust.
      In my opinion one and only reason is that Slovenia did not make enough for national carrier to be profitable as every country is helping their own carriers (once again, not through incentives).

      Delete
  27. Anonymous11:51

    If Adria could not make money with CRJs at the time, the new project will have to take into account rising fuel costs going forward (EU mandates for SAF blending, emission trading scheme, etc). The E175 may not be an optimal answer to that...

    ReplyDelete
  28. In the exYu they kept brainwashing everyone how the Slovenes were the smartest!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And they were. Business wise. But now we have new situation. Smarter ones we work for, singing at the same time Danke Deutschland!

      Delete
  29. Anonymous16:40

    Una nueva telenovela : Aerolinea Slovenia !
    Comedia, drama, catastrofa ..

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous17:33

    It is not at all certain that the government will approve yesterday's proposals. Klemen Boštjančič, the former CEO of Adria and the current Minister of Finance, who is very close to the Prime Minister, believes that the state is not an institution capable of properly managing such a company. A private partner or some strategic partner is the only one who can do it. Boštjančič said that he is once again surprised by some of his colleagues who explain how various projects can easily be funded from public funds. When he commented on tourism, he mentioned that tourists were not frequent passengers on Adria flights and said that a lower ticket price is needed for a tourist product, which is more difficult to achieve with smaller planes, which are significantly more expensive per seat. Due to limited marketing resources, it is also more difficult for smaller companies to achieve recognition among travelers in foreign markets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JU520 BEGLAX19:51

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous20:35

      "When he commented on tourism, he mentioned that tourists were not frequent passengers on Adria flights and said that a lower ticket price is needed for a tourist product, which is more difficult to achieve with smaller planes, which are significantly more expensive per seat"

      What a nonsense. There are not only tourists on LCC but we know about boutique tourist as well. We miss both, but first segment of tourist normally use airports in ZAG/VCE and then ground transport to Slovenia. Second segment of tourist simply won't come to Slovenia and that's what hotel managers explained several times.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous00:15

      Most important part is probably this. "A private partner or some strategic partner is the only one who can do it. Boštjančič said that he is once again surprised by some of his colleagues who explain how various projects can easily be funded from public funds." That means that there will be no new company without private co-investment.

      Delete
    4. JU520 BEGLAX00:59

      As a side note, from the 21 Slovenians I personally know, who live in Ljubljana or near Ljubljana, in the past 4 years, 11 used Italian airports for their travel, 2 used Ljubljana and 10 never travelled by air. Today Saturday I travel ZRH to FCO and my Slovenian friend drives fm LJU area to TRS and takes there AZ to FCO.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous06:02

      But is that a good example? TRS will always be better connected with FCO, even if some airline would start flying directly to/from LJU (likely not on a Saturday, though), so living within driving distance of TRS will always encourage that drive.

      Delete
  31. Anonymous03:41

    Neoliberal economic theory and its adjacent PPP program is not the way to restore reliable air connectivity or re-establish a national carrier. Indeed, these are the very things that destroyed Adria Airways. Flawed advice from a dubious entity. 🤦🏻‍♂️

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous10:27

    I would be scared to fly with slovenian airline. They don’t even have pilots already for many years. Do they really need an airline?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:42

      Here it goes the award for the dumbest comment. Congrats!

      Delete
  33. Anonymous11:26

    I don't know how public opinion sensitive is current Slovenian government but according to today's Delo "almost three quarters of respondents do not want a loss-making carrier". The idea of a new national carrier is most welcomed by demographic groups that hardly ever use an airline :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:29

      It's not just about public opinion, even in the ruling coalition only one - the same one that mostly politically controlled Adria - out of three parties openly supports the idea of a new national carrier, the entire opposition is against it. It seems that the Finance Minister's loud and decisive public warning to Minister Bratovšek that public funds are limited and need to be directed to the key priorities of this government, e.g. reform of the public health system, is crucial.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:33

      If it is true that the same political option that mostly controlled Adria in the past is behind the idea of a new airline, this is an alarm sign at the very beginning.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous20:05

      The other two comments are absolutely relevant and I wouldn't be surprised if the government would give a green light to Bratovšek for stratigic partner option but at the and nothing will happen. So, it will looks like there was a try to do it but due to no interest from private company nothing can be done.

      Delete
  34. Anonymous15:36

    Hopefully they select the A220-100s.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous06:22

    How would the new airline secure slots in AMS? The airport is full and existing airlines there will be forced to reduce operations as the Dutch government reduces the number of permitted flights. Flying to AMS is impossible.

    I have no doubts about the study's conclusions about the current state of air connectivity in Slovenia, but the recent so called subsidy programme was useless. Why not do that properly instead?

    I am not convinced that the study was done by people with aviation expertise. Have they considered the higher seat cost of regional aircraft on routes where competing airlines fly larger equipment?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.