Sarajevo Airport has issued a public call to airlines for the introduction of new routes in return for subsidies. The funds will be distributed to an airline or carriers willing to base aircraft in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s capital, those launching flights to cities within Europe deemed to be of strategic importance, as well as those operating long-haul flights from Sarajevo, i.e., services of over six hours. However, the airport is primarily targeting the introduction of 26 European destinations, some of which are already served. These include Berlin, Memmingen, Malmo, Copenhagen, Paris, Basel, Amsterdam, Eindhoven, London, Brussels, Rome, Milan, Budapest, Prague, Barcelona, Madrid, Geneva, Bari, Lisbon, Dusseldorf, Athens, Tirana, Skopje, Izmir, Antalya and Podgorica. Outside of Europe, the airport is targeting flights from China (including Hong Kong), Singapore, Lebanon, Japan, Jordan, India, Israel, Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as any destination in North America.
Local authorities have allocated some 225.000 euros in subsidies and the amount an airline can get depends on the number of destinations launched, the type of destinations introduced, as well as the offered frequencies. Airlines eligible to apply for the public call, which runs until September 4, will be selected if they launch at least one of the 26 routes of strategic importance, maintain at least two weekly flights on the selected route or routes, project to carry a minimum of 100.000 passengers to/from Sarajevo and operate with an aircraft that has the capacity to seat at least 100 people. Priority will be given to carriers willing to establish a base in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s capital, airlines launching flights from unserved destinations, carriers commencing services from European destinations from the list above, then those increasing frequencies on existing routes, and finally those launching long-haul services.
The development comes after Sarajevo Airport issued a public call late last year for an airline to station an aircraft in the city in return for incentives for which one carrier applied. Although the name of the airline has never been revealed, the airport confirmed it was a non-European company that could not secure permits to operate out of Bosnia and Herzegovina to third countries. Wizz Air’s base closure in Sarajevo late last year has had an impact on the airport’s passenger performance. It is one of the rare European capital city airports to have registered a decline in figures during the first half of the year when compared to the same period in 2022, part of which was still impacted by coronavirus-related travel restrictions.
This is becoming rather sad.
ReplyDeleteDoes Branson still fly to the lover orbit? Maybe he would be also interested. I mean, it's a substantial sum of money.
DeleteFor that money can only Ćumur Airways fly
DeleteFor the all routes they need at least 10 mil €
DeleteThis has to be a joke. This comes to 8.500€ per route - many of them are at least medium haul if not long haul.
ReplyDeleteI thought slovenia is in dire position but, BiH you outdid even yourself
The amount of money is absurdly low. And they want flights to China???
Delete8500 doesn't even cover the permit application process, what are they thinking 😂
DeleteThey obviously don't expect all routes to be established to get the subs, especially not by the same carrier, however I do agree they'll likely need to increase the amount if they want someone serious to base an aircraft and run several routes.
DeleteThat's obviously not all of the money. Cantonal government allocated 500k and the federal will allocate even more
DeleteThe public call says nothing about any additional funds. Also important to note your are talking about BAM not EUR.
DeleteI was definitely talking about EUR
DeleteThe fact that there are no flights to most of the those 26 cities, or that they can't be sustained without state support is problematic.
ReplyDeleteWell, that's the whole point of launching the subsidies... Why do you feel the need to point out that it is problematic?
DeleteBecause I would stand giving money to start flights to some periphery routes but to Paris!?
Delete*understand
Deletemost ex-Yu (capital city) airports are subsidising routes to the most basic of European destinations. I really don’t get it. If you can’t sustain flights to Paris, Amsterdam or Brussels without subsidies then you have a bigger problem.
DeleteWell I think that the German and Swedish destanations can go without subsidies but Paris definitely need subsidies.
DeleteBosnia is rather complicated market when it comes to European routes as there is no habit to fly from Bosnia as a tourist. Economy is sh*t and these markets need to be subsidized as there is no other way. What is the other way? What would upper aviation specialists do to solve Bosnian "bigger problem"? And only problem with these subsidizes is that they are peanuts. But taxpayers in Bosnia are paying for much bigger bullshits that subsidy of 1m € for a FR single route to Rome which will be visited by Bosnian youngsters for 50€ is justified. More than justified! And we have to accept the reality. Sarajevo Airports can't work alone in bringing tourists to Bosnia. There is no National Tourist Board, no strategy, no National ministry of tourism, no campaigns to visit Bosnia abroad. How would people come? And why would they come somewhere where they believe war is still on?
DeleteThere are 3 nation's in BiH so it is not possible to have national tourist board etc. You are wrong. A lot of people travel abroad as a tourists or to visit family and friends. There are currently enough flight to European destinations. All destinations can not be covered as well as currently from Belgrade or Zagreb also.
DeleteBosnia has no 3 nations. However, when using English, "national" refers to something on the state level. Get your mind out of the 90s!
DeleteIn English, in UK nationality is British. In BiH there is no legal ground for national expression or name. In BiH that could be called, common state level. BiH is not country like others, so that should be respected.
DeleteI predict no one will apply
ReplyDeleteSame. Doubt anything will come of this.
DeleteFor that money maybe one route
DeleteCan't wait for Sarajevo-India!
ReplyDeleteYou can't wait, others won't wait bcs it's not happening
DeleteBari? Why on earth is this city on their list of strategically important ones?
ReplyDeleteCasinos for the governmental officials
DeleteI really wonder what the demand is between Bari and Sarajevo lol.
DeleteAll "experts" can not see southern Italy pilgrimage travelers to Medjugorje? Single suothern airport would do either Bari or Brindisi...
DeleteAirport for that is Mostar not Sarajevo.
DeleteBari Mostar has sense but Bari Sarajevo is 😂
DeleteBravo Bosnia and Herzegovina! 🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦
ReplyDeleteBravo for becoming Middle East hub
DeleteOne of the most absurd public calls I have ever seen. Like they didn't know what they want with very limited funds.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteSome of the routes are rather questionable and makes me thing it was tailored towards some airline.
ReplyDeleteMost of these tenders are fixed.
DeleteWizz?
DeleteThey infact intend to have new routes that were in Tuzla
DeleteTo me this looks like pushing some airlines to start flights which would in any case. So I see Anadolujet starting those Turkish routes.
ReplyDeleteGood luck
ReplyDeleteCan't wait for Sarajevo-Jakarta
ReplyDeleteResult of not having a national carrier.
ReplyDeleteNope, this is result of not being able to do your own job. Not everybody needs national carrier, and lets see the situation at those who have, Air Montenegro? Or maybe Croatia Airlines which flies to 15 routes from Zagreb?
DeleteCroatia Airlines handles hundreds of thousands of passengers from Zagreb. You can't compare it to Air Montenegro.
DeleteOh yes, you can compare it. Taking into account size and population of Montenegro, their airline is doing better, or at least equal as OU. Plus, talking about "hundreds of thousands" of passenger on the market of 11 million, just proves how wrong and clueless you are
DeleteThe money is peanuts.
ReplyDeleteMight be getting a bit ahead of themselves with long haul.
ReplyDeleteMight as well have put Timbuktu in there, it's probably more viable than some of the destinations listed.
ReplyDeleteSKP was the first airport do work under concession, then everybody followed.
ReplyDeleteSKP was the first one to offer subsidies (for which it is criticized even today), now everybody does it.
I wouldn't necessarily take pride in the second.
DeleteIt is telling that very few airlines ever apply to these tenders. In Macedonia pretty much Wizz Air has been the only one to reply. For the Sarajevo tender in the past only one airline has applied. In Slovenia just 2 applied...
DeleteIt shows that the markets are not very strong.
DeleteWizz basing six aircrafts (with only 3 required) ... it worked for the airport
Delete250k Way too low
ReplyDeleteAmount of money have to be increased, and it will eventually. However, even if 2 new routes get established and helped with this subsidies, it will achieve its purpose for now.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be smarter to establish a national airline initially with 1 or 2 aircraft and launch most important routes?
ReplyDeleteThey would need a lot more money and someone that would actually know how to do it. Unfortunately, I don't think there is anyone in Bosnia left to work in the aviation sector. That's what not having an airline for 10+ years does.
DeleteI can only imagine running an airline with all the politics and bureaucracy in BiH.
DeleteIf Wizz could not make it work out of Sarajevo with incentives, it is questionable about others.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't about the LF or money as they had both metrics over their company average, those were just rough times for Wizz management
DeleteTransavia could fly from both ORY and AMS to SJJ in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteIf AMS and ORY alone are covered with one airline like Transavia, those subsidies will justify its purpose.
DeleteDa
DeleteAnd Eindhoven too.
DeleteSarajevo needs Wizz replacement ASAP.
ReplyDeleteReplacement had to be found months ago.
DeleteI don’t think they are going to Asia but for Europe they can do it.
ReplyDeleteGood luck Bih!
They have to start from somewhere. So having those subsidies will be a test. Will be awesome to establish a new local airline and connect with a few cities with high demand along with charters. Who knows perhaps some day.
ReplyDeleteUntil when does the tender last?
ReplyDeleteIt says in the article. 4th September.
DeleteMissed it. Thanks
DeleteWhy Memmingen and not Munich???
ReplyDeleteMUC airport is highly expensive.
DeleteNo LCC flies to MUC and Memmingen is only 15-20 minutes further from the central station
DeleteWhile I wish SJJ all the best, I don't see anyone serious applying for this kind of money.
ReplyDeleteOut of those 28 suggested cities, a couple of routes with a high demand and this kind of money offered can work out very well.
ReplyDeleteHope so
DeleteThey can't sutisfy Wizz needs are you joking me that someone will connect america , china , india with sarajevo ?? Better joke I havent heard long time ago especially at morning time :D :D
ReplyDeleteLong haul is far too ambitious. But who knows..Malaysia Airlines with its A330 can fill the plane easily once a week. Tourism plus Australia transit.
DeleteThe demand for a seasonal flight to the US is there actually.
Delete@Anon 10:11
DeleteLOL, sure there is!
BUD and OTP can't support even seasonal flights to the US but SJJ will...
I am speaking from reality perspective , if one country cannot survive its own market with just airline like Wizz which is one of the cheapest options for us balkanians and flying to place where our most diaspora lives , you cannot establish flights like usa , india , thats too much , countrys such as Hungary dont have flights to usa , which is way better enonomicly then Bosnia and its in the EU , have also more visa free countries , its just not make sense , I take only one example and there is thousands ...Reality is bosnia can expexct ryaniair maybe transavia , but nothing more then that , not even long hauls ...
DeleteBosnia has well over 2M passengers on all 4 airports which was unimaginable 5 years ago
DeleteWould be fantastic to see some widebodies at SJJ.
ReplyDeleteWon't happen anytime soon unfortunately.
DeleteHave there ever been any long hauls to Sarajevo?
ReplyDeleteNo. Unless you consider JAT's flights to Baghdad as long haul.
DeleteBaghdad route was because XT?
DeleteI wonder what criteria they used to choose these destinations.
ReplyDeleteHey Siri, name 26 cities with international airports.
DeleteIt really looks like that haha
DeleteIt's like when you ask a child what does it want for a birthday and they start naming random things lol
DeleteApparently head of SJJ and some amateur analyst are at least acquaintances. Wish list of destinations reads as it was put together after a couple of hours of partying.
DeleteAlways thought it would be cool for Sarajevo to attract easyjet but with these destinations, no chance.
ReplyDeleteI believe funding is more of an issue here than the chosen destinations.
DeleteWhy, Berlin, Paris, Basel, Amsterdam, London, Milan, Barcelona, Geneva and Lisbon are all bases for easyJet. Although the most realistic I see Basel and Geneva from Sarajevo with easyJet.
DeleteSarajevo long haul? Please...
ReplyDeleteAegean will apply for SKP ;)
ReplyDeleteSKP ATH and maybe one more.
DeleteSkopje and Tirana are strategically important routes for them? Ok
ReplyDeleteThey want to give money to Aegean and Air Montenegro.
Deletealways funny how SKP and TIA are underestimated here.
DeleteIn this situation SKP and Tirana
DeleteYES , they are way better then Sarajevo!!!
It would bring much more value to the airport if it signed a contract with Air France to launch Paris CDG - Sarajevo and gave them the entire 225,000 for that one route rather than spreading peanuts on a gazillion routes no one will use and no one will apply for.
ReplyDeleteAgree!
Delete"paid route" ?
DeleteYes better to pay a serious airline for one route that can generate transfer passengers and P2P and actually be of use to the general public while having a high likelihood of actually being kept after one year than throwing eurocents on flights to Bari with some no name airline. With Air France you can put another major legacy carrier into your portfolio.
DeleteWizzair was the best thing that happend to SJJ, but they let it go. Nothing will happen now considering the amount of money they are willing to give. Only SKP and maybe TGD will get subsidied i.e Aegean and Air Montenegro.
ReplyDeleteVueling can easily connect Sarajevo with four of those destinations: Barcelona, Paris, London and Amsterdam
ReplyDeleteVueling has very few flights in ex-Yu and they are cutting flights in Croatia. I don't think this is their area of focus.
DeleteVueling withdrawing from Croatia scared by Jasmin 's brilliant strategy, huge growth of OU, especially at its hub, and expected "brand new shiny A220 fleet" 😃
DeleteComedy central
DeleteYou are laughing now but once those A380 start arriving from India, Japan and Bari you will be sorry.
DeleteParis, London and Amsterdam are an absolute must, not sure why these routes don’t exist already? Or why Air France or KLM or British dont fly to Sarajevo, loosing a lot of connections.
ReplyDeleteWell at least Wizz starts Luton in a month and a half. BA used to fly to Sarajevo once upon a time.
DeleteBA has not enough margin to operate a route such this, as Sarajevo prices should be very high in order to have benefits. Vueling is able to operate those destinations at a low cost having benefits.
DeleteFlag companies has nothing to do. People in BiH are not willing to pay the high prices they sell the tickets (see Air Serbia fares). Besides, Western Europe citizens has other attractive destinations available at the same price of AF, KLM and BA. If they have to pay the same price to visit BiH as they have to pay to go to Spain or Italy with Ryanair, Wizz Air or Vueling, they will go to Spain ant Italy with no doubt. BiH needs low cost carriers in order to increase its tourism.
DeleteFlights to London will be restored shortly. Negotiations with Vueling are ongoing. Now if they can get agreement with Vueling for BCN, ORY and AMS in one package it will be game changer.
ReplyDeleteNow if this happens. What are the chances that we wil see an expansion, 26 routes for a airport with roughly 6 gates. In my oppinion Sarajevo Airport should focus on Scandinavian countries, Polen and maybe look forward to begining service to the UK. I believe that with 6 gates and an additional 26 routes is gonna make chaos in Sarajevo making at least half of them leave the deal, or even some workers might end up quiting bc the airport would end up having to work during the night. If this is it wil be a total chaos for Sarajevo. Tho i would like if they began service to Scandanavian countries.
ReplyDeleteOk. But they currently have 30 routes + 26 which adds up to 56 routes. On 6 gates. There wil at least be 3-5 cancelled flight due to chaos .
DeleteYou included charter and seasonal flights. Skopje has 60-65( included with charter and seasonal routes)routes and 5 airbridges so that shouldn’t be a problem for SJJ
DeleteSKP has 6 airbridges, and 15 additional parking positions
DeleteWhy american friends dont open just 1 flight to somwhere in usa.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of money is a joke
ReplyDelete"Šta ćeš od priloga?
ReplyDelete- sve"
This new management did enormous work when it comes to SJJ. More have been done then for the past 20 years. More is to come. SJJ will became boutique modern airport. From financial aspect SJJ is doing more than very well. All hubs in Europe will be covered in time. It is possible that at some point in time authorities will establish local airline and hopefully with foreign CEO who will make things right. Tourism will eventually determine this outcome. Bravo Sarajevo
ReplyDeleteLOL! SJJ could not keep Wizz, enormous work indeed. Less is to come, not more. Portoroz is a boutique airport, not Sarajevo. All hubs will be covered in time? What, in about 50 years from now? Establishing local airline with foreign CEO was attempted several times and failed every time.
DeleteSJJ is relatively small airport in one capital city. Once all work is completed it can offer services like many high end airports in Europe. SJJ is not competing with any airport in the region. It is good thing in a long run. From SJJ you can reach any destination in the world with LH/LX/QR/TK. Obviously you want much more than this, in that case BEG and ZAG are not far away. Good luck.
ReplyDeleteIt should've done a bigger expansion but yes, when all the office spaces and restaurants are open it's gonna be on the same level as Split and Dubrovnik spacewise
Delete