Air Serbia’s upcoming network strategy to rely on longer sector routes


Air Serbia will primarily focus on adding frequencies to its existing network in the coming period, while new destinations will mostly involve longer sectors, with the majority of routes with point-to-point demand from Belgrade having already been launched. Speaking at the Aviation Day South East Europe conference this week, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “You have to grow. You cannot stop, because if you stop there is a free market and free competition and someone else will grow and take your market and your profitability will be jeopardised. We will continue to grow. We have now reached the critical mass of destinations, so the main focus will be on densification, that is, improving the connectivity, which we already foresaw for this summer”. He added, “Historically, we used to have 25% to 28% transfers but now we are reaching almost 40%. Therefore, any new destination will naturally get feed from the network”.

With over 100 destinations served from Belgrade Airport, few remain that could be successful by solely relying on passengers travelling between a city-pair. “There are almost no point-to-point destinations missing from Belgrade. Even Wizz Air’s latest expansion was mostly directed towards destinations already served and not opening new ones. That shows there is already a lack of point-to-point destinations. Any new destination will have to rely on the hub carrier which will provide connectivity in the network. For example, if you are opening something like Tbilisi, Baku or Yerevan, those destinations do not have enough point-to-point demand and they will have to rely on the feed from our network. Therefore, this is indicative that our next development strategy will be mostly on the longer sector routes, which will rely on regional connectivity”, Air Serbia’s CEO said.


Belgrade Airport destination network, summer 2023

Developing the long-haul network remains a priority. “During the summer we secured traffic rights for Guangzhou and Shanghai, and it is just a matter of time before we get a third and fourth wide-body that those destinations will be launched. However, the potential on China routes will be further increased, especially cargo operations, because of the Free Trade Agreement [signed between Serbia and China this week]. This agreement has a very positive impact to grow our potential which is already there”, Air Serbia’s CEO said.

Mr Marek noted the airline has significantly decreased seasonality and will further do so, which is illustrated by its upcoming 2023/24 winter timetable with a significant increase in frequencies on existing routes. “Addressing the seasonality was always part of our strategy. During the 2022/23 winter we were able to prove that putting a wider network portfolio into the winter built on connectivity made sense, because we were profitable every single month through the winter season. We were operating with an over 70% load factor, and, for us, 70% is more or less break even. Based on that, we are expanding even more this winter”. He added, “Historically, there was a big difference between summer and winter, around 50%. Now we are getting to the level of just 30% difference, and it will continue falling. Especially because we will continue developing long-haul flights. For example, China has flatter seasonality than North American routes, so all of this will go towards flattening seasonality. There will always be a summer peak because of charter demand, which is very strong. However, we are also addressing that. For the first time this year, some of the destinations that used to be charters were transformed into scheduled, and in that way, we also extended the season. All these destinations that we transferred into scheduled routes start in mid-May and some run until mid-October rather than from June 15 until September 15”.



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:04

    Good to see they will increase frequencies. I don't expect that we will see too many new routes next year but it is good they will keep growing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      I think so too. But if you think about it, them adding another daily flight to Paris is the same as if they added 3 new routes (frequency wise).

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:12

      It depends what means "too many".

      If they want to add 3 new ATR's they surely plan something like CLJ, KIV, GRZ, OMO (with financial support) etc at the same time increasing frequencies on already existing routes.

      Maybe they will also stop flying on wet leased DAT ATR72-500.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:14

      Agree.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous23:17

      Air Serbia should add more UK flights other than just London Heathrow.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:07

    It is obvious they will launch either Tbilisi/Baku/Yerevan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Me thinks so too.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:15

      Marek mentioned these destinations by saying that all 3 are almost only transfer destinations.

      Probably they would need much more time to make them work than it was the case with LIS for example where almost only P2P passengers fly to.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:17

      With some marketing all three Caucasus destinations could work.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:08

      I think that next they will be introducing Baku,

      Delete
    5. Anonymous17:42

      Baku is the least feasible option of them.
      Azerbaijan has no diaspora while Armenia has a HUGE diaspora and Georgians dont need visa for Europe.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:08

    Leisure long-haul destinations please!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      La Habana!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:16

      ^ visas have been reintroduced on both sides so don't think so.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:18

      Hmmm... too bad, why?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:18

      To stop the influx of illegal Cuban immigrants.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:20

      To Europe via Serbia?

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:21

      google it

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:27

      Would be great if Beograd had a vibrant Cuban community.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous09:28

      To Serbia. Belgrade is full of Cubans at the moment.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous09:38

      👍
      Mala Havana u Beogradu.

      Delete
    10. Thailand would work well as a winter charter I think

      Delete
    11. Anonymous10:01

      I like Bangkok

      Delete
    12. Anonymous14:01

      It was mentioned many times before that Bangkok could fill but the yield is trash. There are a tonne of options from Europe to Bangkok.

      Delete
    13. Anonymous14:03

      Fingers crossed for Caracas!

      Delete
    14. Anonymous14:17

      Honestly? You really think that there is a chance for Caracas?

      Delete
    15. Anonymous14:22

      Venezuela is a beautiful country.
      Also very affordable.
      There are no flights to Venezuela from central and eastern Europe.
      There will be connecting traffic to Russia too.
      And due to political reasons JU might be able to get some concessions from Caracas airport to launch the route.

      Delete
    16. Anonymous23:14

      Serbia introduced visas to Cubans, but Cuba hasn't done so. I came back 15 days ago.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:09

    They need to improve their onboard product on long-haul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:17

      I think they need to improve their customer service at the time some flight gets cancelled. Many times we heard complaints that passengers have been left to find their own way of accomodation if the cancelled flight had been scheduled as evening flight.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:17

      At least it's nice to see they have refreshed their website.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:21

      Putting lipstick on a pig

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:27

      ^ you make it sound as if their website is bad so they put lipstick on a pig. Their website was absolutely fine. They recently made it possible to make changes to your ticket online, which wasn't possible before (you had to call the call center). So now you can change the date of your flight or even destination online which is good.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:28

      But that pig is gorgeous.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:31

      Nice so we can welcome JU to like 2010. Lol

      Delete
    8. Anonymous09:36

      OU still does not offer this option, or for example the possibility to purchase ancillaries through their website.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous09:38

      Who cares about OU. They are not who we should compare JU with.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous13:07

      They obviously did a great job; trying to see that new improved site and getting this:
      Oops! An Error Occurred
      The server returned a "404 Not Found".
      Something is broken. Please let us know what you were doing when this error occurred. We will fix it as soon as possible. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
      And of course there is no space for a feedback although I was doing nothing except waiting to be connected to their magic new site.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous14:16

      Yeah, happened to me too. But then it quickly opened after a refresh.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:15

    So it seems that the 3rd and 4th A330s are coming soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      Fingers crossed

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:19

      So it seems. But wheeeen?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:22

      Third in 2024 and fourth in Q1 2026

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:25

      @09:15 where did you read that they are coming soon? "just a matter of time" as he said doesn't mean soon or that the birds are on their way.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:39

      Marek said it recently in one of his numerous interviews

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:53

    Out of service are YU APA,APF,APD,ALZ plus SX-RMA. Today flies ETF while the other E195 is still waiting to be delivered to Air Serbia.
    YU APF,APD are in Naples for regular maintenance. I don´t know what´s wrong with APA and SX RMA... I think YU ALZ is in Sofia for maintenance.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:01

      Wow their fleet is Falling apart yet Marek dreams of some growth.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:12

      I think JAT Tehnika is the biggest obstacle to JU's growth.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:10

      The fleet isn't falling apart. It's the season for sending aircraft on scheduled maintenance. It happens every year. Nothing new here.

      JU currently doesn't have an issue with employees leaving. Marek mentioned in this very interview that a group of pilots have started their captain upgrades as new pilots joined the company. With cabin crew there is a surplus.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:14

      Then why so many wet leases?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous14:31

      I really don't understand what is the matter between JAT Technica and Air Serbia ?!

      Delete
    6. Anonymous16:03

      A number of reasons for the amount of wet leases were given:

      - Inability to source aircraft as quick as their expansion. Airlines are still recovering from Covid, while JU is well past recovered. This expansion has turned out to be fantastic for their finances as they have finally turned a profit after decades of losses.
      - Aircraft that were supposed to be available have suddenly stayed longer with their current airlines as they continue to have issues with new aircraft.
      - Shortages of spare parts has meant a delay to the delivery of aircraft. 2 ATR's were delayed this summer (YU-ASB, YU-ASD) due to landing gear maintenance issues, that is the inability to get parts for them. This was the reason behind ATR's and Dash 8's being wet leased this summer. Problems with spare parts isn't an issue exclusive to JU.
      - Seasonality was a major issue for JU. In the article above, you can see that the difference was around 50%, currently it is around 30%. In other words, 50% of the fleet was not needed in the winter season. With the B733 retired, that capacity has to come from somewhere.
      - The finances isnt there for brand new aircraft just as yet, so they have to rely on leases. It is more than evident that they are using wet, damp and dry leases to set in a fleet strategy that will eventually lead to a decent purchase. This will allow time for the new technology to mature.

      You can see the full interview with Marek on youtube. I highly recommend watching it.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous18:28

      Thanks for your good analysis. Question, given improving finances and huge expansion over the last few years, when do you think JU will purchase new planes, and what types?

      Delete
    8. Anonymous19:13

      Marek mentioned that once JU reaches the 35 aircraft mark they will look into purchasing aircraft. My guess is 35 dry leases as they were around 32 aircraft this summer when wet leases are included. Next summer should see 30 dry leases (currently the count is 22 ac + 3 AT7's + 3 A320's + 2 A330's), plus Embraer's on contract similar to what US major carriers have (American Eagle, United Express) plus a couple wet leases (notably Dan Air), so close to 40 aircraft.

      ATR's are fairly new so I don't see the rush to buy new models for that fleet any time soon. JU is still experimenting with the ERJ's, they seem to be a great fit for the fleet but JU doesn't seem ready to commit fully to the aircraft. My guess is an A320neo order in 2025, 10 plus 5 options, with the first deliveries around the 100th anniversary in 2027.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous23:27

      Make sense 👌

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:59

    Comparing to JAT there are political obstacles in opening new routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:02

      There were many bureaucratic obstacles in opening routes during the JAT era (much more than today). You couldn't just launch any route you felt like. You had to get approvals, which were usually limited in terms of frequencies and usually meant that the competing national airline would be obligated to launch its own flights etc.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous10:07

    I wonder how many new routes we might see next year

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:08

    Good approach

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous10:08

    Well done Air Serbia. Really looking forward to their developments

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:34

      Their fleet reminds more and more the fleet of MEA, bar the turboprops.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:50

      Apropos MEA, i fear they will no more exist in the near future...

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:20

      Why?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous19:05

      Situation in Lebanon is horrible.
      It's a miracle MEA is still flying.
      A real same for a once great airline.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous10:09

    I think we will see up to 5 new destinations next summer and an increase in frequencies on most routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:27

      Wrong!!! At least 10. Guanghou , Shanghai, Toronto seasonal, Miami, Antalia, Hurgada and one more will become regular lines, plus many charter will become seasonal.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:35

      I think Antalya can only become a scheduled route if they allow Turkish to fly it too and I'm not sure they are prepared to do that.

      Delete
  12. Analiticar10:11

    What is their problem with those A330's?

    While they're waiting for them their ship will set sail.

    - How come two a A330 aren't enough for 4-5 long-haul destinations in winter?
    - Is the A330 the only aircraft capable of flying this route? How about dirt-cheap A340's which have the same type-rating?
    - Why they can't get a wet lease like with Marathon?
    - Will the lower cost of rent if they find it cover the losses incurred by not flying the route for six months or more?
    - What if next summer planes on the lease market become even more expensive?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:31

      - 2 A330's cannot do 4-5 long haul destinations as they are used on the current 3 which have fairly decent utilisation.
      - A340 wasn't really all that popular with airlines and went mostly for scrapping once being retired from the fleet. It might be slightly cheaper to lease but not cheaper to operate (fuel and maintenance) compared to the A330.
      - Most likely not. A340's would just unnecessarily increase expenses reducing profitability. Although its the same type as the A330, crew would still need differences training.
      - Dynamics is not the same on short haul and long haul. Wet lease might work somewhat for short haul, definitely more challenging on long haul.
      - What if next summer we have another pandemic and the closing of borders? Or increased global conflict?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous22:02

      Then they should buy the aircraft, that's it.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous10:29

    @administracija,
    Pa kako oni koji ne znaju engleski da citaju?A imaju volje da prate..... Imate nacin da se to resi?
    Hvala.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:02

      mnogi brauzeri imaju automatsko prevodjenje dobro dosao u 21. vek.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:29

      ja 75 godina, objasni, i hvala za 21.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:03

      Otvorite članak u Google Chrome pretraživaču, potom kada otvorite članak uradite desni klik mišem i kliknite na "prevedi stranicu" ili ako je na engleskom onda "translate page", i Google Chrome će automatski prevesti celu stranicu na srpski jezik.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:12

      Buraz, ti si divan.

      Delete
  14. Jasmineeeeeee!!! Dje si? Kaka' je kahva? Petak danas, hvala Bogu. A i pemzija ce brzo. Sta's bolje? Kake puste linije i avioni, jos i gradovi sa im ni ime ne meres procitat, sto se s tim zamarat.... Samo tako, uzivaj

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:12

      Hahaga

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:33

      😂😂😂😂

      Delete
    3. Anonymous19:18

      He da best!!

      Delete
  15. ilijabgc10:45

    Will be the third and fourth A330 a problem for Tianjin flights ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:03

      Why would it be a problem for TIanjin?

      Delete
    2. ilijabgc11:05

      Just asking, I think that Tianjin flights isn’t supposed to be on JU routes, I don’t know if it gain a lot of money, cargos and passengers

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:34

      The route has been very successful for them so I believe they will keep it. It has been consistently full and, more importantly, there is a lot of cargo on the route.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:34

      It was mentioned before and after the launch of TSN that they would prefer PEK, however if TSN is proven to work then they will keep it. TSN seems to be working for them, despite the long ground time of the aircraft in TSN and is being increased this winter.

      Delete
  16. Anonymous11:00

    Good new routes would me Manchester and Bordeaux.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:03

      +1

      Delete
    2. ilijabgc11:04

      +1, Toulouse can be lunch too

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:13

      They should look at Baghdad and Erbil too. A lot of ethnic demand to central and northern Europe.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:10

      Just realized that ilijabgc meant launch and not lunch. Hhaaha

      Delete
    5. ilijabgc14:32

      Haha nice thanks to correcting me

      Delete
    6. Anonymous16:34

      No problem bro

      Delete
    7. Anonymous22:34

      +1 for TLS!

      Delete
  17. Anonymous12:33

    Their network is pretty impressive. I was shocked when I found out the other day that Austrian Airlines does not fly to Madrid?!?! I couldn't believe it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:35

      Didn't know that either.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous15:47

      Why would Austrian fly VIE-MAD if there are already multiple daily flights on that route? Including three daily by IB? To compete with IB on that market they would have to fly also multiple daily and that would mean a lot of money lost in entering the market.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16:32

      Because Madrid is a major European city and OS should fly there at least daily.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous17:05

      Europe is full of major cities. Austrian flies where they can make money. Tourists fly to MAD from VIE on the low cost carriers, business flies on IB, transfers to South America fly on IB and apparently there are only few and far between people that would like to transfer onto Austrian in VIE somewhere within the region of Eastern and Southern Europe. The latter are well covered via Munich or Frankfurt by LH, because LH flies to MAD.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous18:19

      Having said all that keep in mind that OS has pretty good coverage of eastern Europe, as well as other regions. Which combined with local demand could easily fill a A320 to MAD.
      Think of it as a missing link in your network that you have to fill to be a more complete and competitive airline.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous12:36

    Now that sas is bought by air france-klm is there any chance for a big codeshare between JU and SAS? That would cover scandinavia in full

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:36

      And balkans for SAS i forgot that in the previous post

      Delete
  19. Anonymous12:36

    Didn't they plan KIV for 2020 expansion (before covid hit)?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous14:42

    40% transfernih putnika je iznenađujuće dobra brojka. Mogli bi da razmotre da transferni putnici na drugom letu dobiju lanč paket bez obzira da li je let kraći od 2,5h.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:54

      Možda neki novi lunch paket, ovaj nema potrebe da daju nikome.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:08

      A šta fali sendviču,vodi i orasnici?

      Delete
  21. Anonymous14:48

    BT and A3 will benefit a lot from those KIV flights

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous15:45

    O&D demand between Baltics and KIV is close to zero. BT simply has nowhere to use their planes in a sensible way (other than wetleasing the planes to others). They are preparing an IPO and therefore need to hide that obvious truth at any cost.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous15:56

    O&D demand tho to Greece is kinda big, KIV was one of the biggest unserved markets out of ATH and that's why those flights will be a success. Also Aegean is turning ATH into a hub so I think a lot of people from other countries too will prefer Aegean to get to KIV.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous16:18

    I don't think it's good for a CEO to say that the market is exhausted. From this I understand that the competition between JU and W6 will intensify going forward. Wizz Air will 100% have a large base as SOF or SKP in a few years.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous16:24

    KIV gets more and more Fly One flights, Hi Sky bases another aircraft and launches over 10 new destinations this summer. Headwind throughout the Air Moldova program to Antalya. AirBaltic, Aegean Airlines, Azerbaijan Airlines (transfers to Russia), Israir, EL AL, TAROM are increasing frequencies. They have much more of a good 2023 compared to 2022. I don't think Air Moldova has a chance to come back.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous16:26

    I'm looking forward to the holiday next week. Hope to hear new destinations.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous16:28

    IMO potencial new routes :
    Baku, Manchester, Dublin, Alicante, Ibiza, Tenerife, Seville, greek routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:32

      Those Greek routes can be Santorini, Mykonos, Kos, Kalamata, Kefalonia or Zakynthos.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:58

      The ATR is the perfect aircraft for a route like Belgrade-Corfu-Belgrade.
      With them JU can easily increase frequency instead of stagnating with twice a week they had this summer.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:40

      Corfu went from being a charter route in previous years to a seasonal scheduled route this summer with an increase to the number of flights and capacity. How is this stagnation?

      Delete
  28. Anonymous17:12

    Time to start more destinations in Poland and mount a challenge to LOT for transfers. LOT needs alternative in SEE and Air Serbia is the only one offering regional, EuroMed and long haul alternative. Time is ripe to take a larger bite out of LOT marketshare.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:55

      The only alternative except for LH, OS, KL, SAS, BA and some other transfer airlines that can take you from/to Polish destinations. And of course plentitude of direct flights on low cost carriers.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:11

      Plentitude, indeed.

      Delete
  29. Anonymous21:02

    Those airlines are not based in SEE (except arguably OS) and in most cases offer poor coverage/frequency compared to Air Serbia presence within ex Yu wider region. This is not just taking away passengers from Polish airports but also LOT passengers originating from ex Yu airports transferring to European and some long haul destinations.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous23:19

    Chisinau will not be added soon, given the deteriorating relations between Serbia and Moldova and arbitrary barring of Serbian nationals to enter Moldova due to "security issues".

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous08:29

    Come back to Cleveland like in the Yugoslavia days lol, large population of ex yu plus with only flights to Dublin from Cleveland, Americans also could use Belgrade to connect onwards to plenty of European destinations. Almost a win win for both

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      Good idea bro.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous00:03

      Actually this is a solid idea. Maybe better than Miami.

      Delete
  32. BA88816:17

    Why is LTN listed on the Europe map?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:18

      Because it is served by Wizz. It's a map of served destinations from BEG.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:18

      Oh. It say BEG routes for JU article…fun

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.