Belgrade Airport announces new terminal expansion


Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport has unveiled plans to expand its terminal building, with the project set to be completed in time for the specialised Expo 2027, taking place in the Serbian capital between May and August of that year. The expansion will include the addition of three new gates in the recently extended C pier of the terminal, accompanied by four new aircraft parking positions. The addition of gates C15 - C17 will add a further 18.353 square metres to the C wing for a total size of 45.298 square metres. As part of its ongoing expansion and overhaul so far, the airport has increased its size by an extra 39.300 square metres to 93.651 square metres and added an extra twelve gates for a total of 31, as well as eleven new parking stands for a total of 38.



Nicolas Notebaert, CEO of VINCI Concessions and President of Belgrade’s operator VINCI Airports, said, "Since the start of the concession, we have been working closely with the Serbian authorities and all our partners to improve Nikola Tesla Airport and to make it a hub in Southeast Europe serving fifteen million passengers by the end of concession period. At the end of 2023, the airport welcomed close to eight million passengers compared to 6.2 million in 2019 and added 46 new destinations and 86 new routes, now with 116 routes in total. There are four and soon to be five long-haul destinations".

The airport is still expanding its existing facilities, with most of the work focused on the addition of 4.000 square metres of commercial space inside the terminal building, which will see the opening of new food and beverage facilities and shops, for a total of 9.000 square metres. Work has also begun on the installation of passport eGates, which are expected to be completed by October. The sixteen eGates are expected to expedite passport control procedures five-fold. As a result, capacity at the airport’s passport control area has temporarily been reduced by some 25% as some of its 29 passport control booths have been shut down to make way for the eGate installation.





Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Congratulations!!! 🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    When can we expect construction to begin?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:07

      Likely soon if it is to be fully operational by May 2027.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:47

      We need more of automatic walking elevetors/paths its hard for people to make either connect flights or to go to passport control walking all the way ...extension yes but make it easier on passengers than...otherwise fantadtic work.Belgrade Airport !

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:04

    Hobestly 3 gates won't be enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      *honestly

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:27

      It should be fine, the real problem is if they can add more remote stands and where.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:28

      The C concourse cannot be extended indefinitely. They should build gates on both sides of the concourse C (mirroring the gates from C7 to new C17). The other solution would be to build a satellite terminal where the current Fire and Rescue building is located, across concourse A.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:11

      So how many planes may be parked at the same time when this is finished? 41? And how many gates and remote stands?

      Delete
    5. It says 38 in the article and that sounds about right, but I haven't been at the Belgrade airport in quite a while.
      If I'm not mistaken, I think there are 24 gates with air bridges and 14 remote stands. When they add those additional 3 gates that'll be 41.
      I think that should be more than enough for an airport of 10 - 15 million passengers.
      It's more important for the terminal itself to function smoothly and has everything it needs, rather than adding even more gates at this point.
      Just look at ZAG, which on the other hand definitely needs more gates and better gates. It's bizarre that with a max. capacity of 5 million, it only has 8 narrow gates and 4 additional parking spots. The only reason it functions relatively smoothly, is the fact that planes often park in front of the old terminal, 3 km away. I wonder what the expansion will look like at ZAG.
      BEG has had its hiccups over the past couple of years, but it's doing alright over all. In fact, it's doing great. If in 15 years there'll be need for even larger capacity, I think an entirely new terminal will be needed.

      Delete
  4. ilijabgc09:05

    Congratulations Serbia!
    We hope that the airport will get a spotting terrasse like Geneva, and a spotting zone outside the airport.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vlad09:09

    Too little too late IMO. At the rate JU is growing, these gates will be needed by next summer. Also, the airport is getting a bit unbalanced with the A-gate area practically unchanged and the C-gate area now stretching for more than a kilometre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      It would be more logical if W6 moved at the end of C gates.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:24

      Come on, do you or does anyone honestly care about balance between A and C gates? The things you can read here...

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:30

      It's not about balance, think about transfer pax running from C17 to C1 and vice versa. Walking to the arrivals area will also take a while.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:34

      Vlad the rate JU grew in August was 4.7%

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:37

      Тhe comment made by Anon 09:16 is very valid. The current walk from the end of the C concourse is rather long already especially for elderly and disabled people, parents with small kids etc. The travelator rarely works 100% (i.e. some sections work some don't), every time I have been at the airport some of it was not functional.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:45

      I don't understand what do you guys think is the solution. Make the airport smaller? If you have ever been to any larger airport you would know that long walks are pretty normal and unfortunately unavoidable. As BEG is growing it will have to take up more and more space which means longer walks, but that's just the way it is.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:53

      +1 last anon. It's s part of an airport. Even the best ones like Doha and Singapore have long walks.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous10:05

      @09:53
      Doha and Singapore have long walks because they handle 60 million passengers a year, not 8.5 like BEG.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous10:14

      8.5 million is a still a large number which requires 25-30 gates and therefore long walks.

      Delete
    10. The walk is long yes, when the passenger numbers is 8-9 million but will be more reasonable when it reaches 15 million by the next 10 years. and unfortunately this is the best that the airport can do, its very limited by the location and geography.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous10:28

      A solution could be using both sides of the corridor rather than 1. This is practically the case in almost all major airports.
      This solution wouldn't be possible for the entire length, but there should be more than adequate space for A320/737 size aircraft starting from around gate C10. This would give them space for 7-10 new gates rather than the current 3 planned without drastically extending the C wing, along with the possibility for additional remote stand gate space below.

      Delete
    12. Anonymous12:07

      God prleople complaining about the distance . Takes 8-10 min walk from 1 end to the other . Can not believe how dramatic people are on here. Congratulations BEG .. way to go .

      Delete
    13. Anonymous12:43

      ATR flights became unfavorable to me with new expansion and I avoid them - long wait if you have to check in (all pax in the same lane, not fair for 50 ATR pax to wait an hour because some A320 checks in at the same time, and couple of A319). The gates are far away and the bus ride to the aircraft goes around all the airport). Just too much fuss for quick ATR ride.

      Delete
    14. Anonymous13:04

      It is 10 minute walk for grown young or mid age adult. For kids and elderly it is far from 10 min walk. For instance, open passport boots at C that is used now for cabin crew exclusivly.
      Notnfor everyone, but those who have flight on C gates its far better than to go all aro8md the airport.

      Delete
    15. Anonymous13:42

      One reason I don't see BEG reopening passport control at the A wing is that it avoids the duty free and retail areas of the terminal. Besides, the new e gates should make that part of the travel experience at BEG easier/quicker.

      As for check in, JU should consider installing automatic check in and baggage drop off counters, which would reduce the need for ground staff in that part of the terminal.

      Delete
    16. Anonymous13:46

      JU used to have them before the airport reconstruction.

      Delete
    17. Anonymous13:50

      JU only had check in kiosks but not automated baggage drop off.

      Delete
    18. Anonymous13:54

      Oh yes they did. Several counters were equipped with barcode scanners that you could use. Only issue is it usually didn't work properly.

      Delete
    19. Anonymous15:53

      I must of never noticed them. Thanks for the pictures and for the correction. Hopefully an improved version returns.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:17

    It will be good if they plent all the trees as they presented on 3d model above. And put planes on display of course. Somehow, it looks to me, that all green area will become a parking lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      You can already see now that it is not going to happen because the current parking is where the trees are on the picture. This was the artistic approach, now reality is a bit different with more asphalt and concrete in place.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:08

      +1
      Where will the parking go for this park to be build/planted?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:09

      They will build it but currently construction material and camp is in the area where the park is supposed to be. It can be built after they finish this expansion.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:13

      @10.08 the parking is visible in the render and it is where the existing parking is.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:32

      The render is far far nicer than reality sadly..like is so often the way

      Delete
    6. Anonymous12:23

      However, some greenery is needed. What about moving walkaways, they have been announced. And Terminal 1 renovation?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous12:25

      Moving walkways already exist inside the expanded C pier. As for greenery, they have planted trees outside and there are plants alongside the walkways in front of the new terminal but it takes time to grow and become visible.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous16:03

      Some greenery and benches would be great for the arrivals area. The current look is bland and unpleasant.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous16:03

      As always the renders are B!

      Delete
    10. Anonymous16:50

      Yes the arrivals corridor is stupidly empty. At least put some plants along the way to fill up the space and make it somewhat pleasant.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:30

    BEG needs a new airport as the sretching of the pier makes it more and more inconvenient for transfer passengers. BEG will further grow also in the long haul and it needs an airport with a capacity of 20 mio, which can be expanded later. By the time it will be built, BEG will have 13-14 mio pax.
    A new airport with two RWYs, a train station, two piers and a large retail zone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      We do not need a new airport. We needed to have build a 2nd runway that would have been able to be used concurrently with the main.
      And we need a train connection to the city with a station within the airport.
      Also we need to do something about the 3rd world taxi drivers situation...

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:31

    Expanding the already too-long C-pier doesn’t seem like the correct way to scale..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      +1000
      I think it is the cheapest option for Vinci.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:47

      Where else can they expand?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:16

      Well, as soon as the approach road is moved (as State is reschuffling roads and junction at BEG) few hundred meters to west there will be more space for further gates (C18-C34)

      Delete
    4. Anonymous13:50

      C pier should have gates on both sides, just mirror the gates from c7 to c14 and u have nice expansion without adding more lenght to C pier

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:14

      exactly, you can add more gates on the other side, exclusively for narrow-body planes... plus it would be an amazing site as you drive towards the airport

      Delete
    6. Anonymous17:01

      Something like this
      https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QQ2-33xJfYw/XWW-9cFl_jI/AAAAAAAAt9s/_v1K5LGAfq0p4w4bK4LZjDiyRKmPLUjfQCLcBGAs/s1600/Aerial_View_low.jpg

      Delete
    7. Anonymous21:39

      @ Anonymous 17:01 - exactly. It looks great. I hope they implement it. Another option would be building a satellite terminal across the concourse A and have it for low-cost carriers or connect it via underground tunnel

      Delete
    8. Anonymous22:10

      Problem with building across the A wing is that there is currently construction happening there (directly across from Jat Tehnika) which doesn't allow much space for anything else. Plus the line up of aircraft in front of the hangar isn't pleasant nor is it an ideal site for a satellite terminal.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:33

    So is this a new terminal or is it an expansion of the current one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      It says in the article

      "The expansion will include the addition of three new gates in the recently extended C pier of the terminal"

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:49

    Is there any space behind A10 to expand?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      I don't think so. What they can do is expand the A area by knocking down the old control tower but that just adds terminal space, not gates.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:52

      No, they would have to move cargo facilities and general aviation, but even then it would only be enough for maybe 3 gates because of roads nearby.

      Delete
    3. I think they should move the road underground in that part, so that terminal can continue expanding in that direction and one day maybe even connect to the new terminal building

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:31

      Branko has the idea.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous17:18

      @13:01 Exactly.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous18:58

      That's Branko BTW

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:52

    They should have built these three additional gates from the very beginning when they expanded C gates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:53

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:10

      I really don't understand why they didn't

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:23

      Anonymous09:52 It was planned right up until corona hit the world. C15-C17 was cancelled with the intention to be added until 2030, as the project was running out of money. Now they will have some issues if they want to finish it all off in time since the PBB's has a 2 year delivery time...

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:56

    Glad they started work on eGates

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous10:02

    Good news

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:09

    True dat. Hopefully the travelator will work and we won;t have to walk all of that.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous10:10

    Arriving at C17 to get to passport control will probably take around 20 minute walk

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous10:17

    Well at least this, plus the aviation museum will finally reopen by 2027.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:55

      Really, whole that story about museum is annoying to me.

      They closed museum 3-4 years ago and for that time they managed only to repair the stairs??? Why did they close the musem if they repaired stairs located outside?

      And now when the stairs are done they close the museum in order to reopen it in 3 years.

      Typically for us.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:57

      Because it was changing hands as to who operates the museum and who pays for these renovations. They have resolved that now.

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/02/aeronautical-museum-in-belgrade-to-be.html

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:00

      It is amazing they needed 3 f...ing years to resolve it.

      I hope the changes in museum won't be only cosmetic.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:28

      If it were gradsko građevinsko zemljište it would be sorted in 3 days, but for museum it takes 3 years. Priorities...

      Delete
    5. Anonymous18:14

      It took 15 years to reopen Narodni muzej closed in 2003. I know we are all aviation enthusiast, but I don't see a big issue for the culture in the country that aviation museum is not working for 3 or 6 years.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous18:40

      I know there is already a location for a museum, but why not make that old tower into a new aviation museum or at least a section of it, or even a joint private/public operated museum, that would be “ground to sky museum” showcasing interesting things from the ground as you climb, reaching the top floor with the airport/flights observatory deck, with that flight simulator, that I heard about but could never find it when at BEG. They should make a call to foreign private aviation museums to bid for this and assign one do this project. Plenty of amazing and well ran museums of that kind in states alone that would be great at this. Probably should be within the airport secure zone too, so that the transfer and delayed-flights passengers could easily take advantage of this.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous08:23

      Good idea.

      Flight simulator was in museum, not in airport building.

      Delete
  17. Anonymous10:27

    What about reconstruction of old terminal?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:42

      There is not a lot that needs to be done there. Just change the flooring.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:22

      On the other side of the corridor at C.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous10:34

    SEAD confrrence showed 34 bridges at the end of concession. 10 more then now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:41

      And where will they be located?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:22

      On the other side of the corridor at C.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:34

      I think you are confusing it with another plan by another company that was bidding for BEG concession. VINCI has no plans to to build gates on the other side of the corridor.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:32

      Nisam pobrkao. Ko je bio na konferenciji video je

      Delete
    5. Anonymous15:46

      Ko god da je bio nek da neki link.

      Delete
  19. Anonymous10:48

    Nice but where is BEG's new CEO? He is nowhere to be seen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:16

      Wait, probably in school, it started this week...

      Delete
  20. Anonymous10:54

    Does anyone know what's this black building next to the control tower, future hotel maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous11:16

    Anonymous09:52 It was planned right up until corona hit the world. C15-C17 was cancelled with the intention to be added until 2030, as the project was running out of money. Now they will have some issues if they want to finish it all off in time since the PBB's has a 2 year delivery time...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:36

      PBB?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:47

      PBB = Passanger Boarding Bridge.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:20

      Thanks.

      Delete
  22. Anonymous11:33

    Literally a horrid design sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous12:50

    Okay so when this is completed, where is the space to expand? Seems like they are running out of space

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous13:08

    They can build proper expansion in the direction of current remote stands and fire department. But that would require money and thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous13:34

    They should expand A Gates and get rid of old cargo terminal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:04

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous15:38

      Not until new one is built and functioning.

      Delete
  26. Why couple years ago they said it would be 4 more gates and now they downgraded to 3 !?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:36

      No, it was always 3 gates with 4 parking positions as you can see from the tenders created 5 years ago.

      Delete
  27. Anonymous15:33

    The best under the circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous15:42

    Are the E-Gates only for Serbian passport holders? Because other nationalities still need to get stamped in/out, right?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous21:57

    Great. Essential to install more automatic walking paths though.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous07:42

    They should make the gate areas more interesting. Displays, kiosks, artworks, statues, food stalls, just a bit more lively

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous09:23

    Oh wow! Seems like someone should've looked at the development plan from the 1980s, and continued that way... what a surprise.. will they realize next year that they also need a second runway? maybe a third terminal dedicated to JU?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous09:23

    What will happen to the park with old airplanes that was shown on the render? Couldn't there be an underground parking lot instead of the current one?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous09:39

    Great news. However, passengers need functioning travelators (moving walkaways) in both directions! More than a couple of those that rarely work.

    ReplyDelete
  34. We already called C14- C Dobanovci, what a now, C - Batajnica???Why don't use outer, inner side if existing C pier?? It,s look like opposite of Amsterdam,

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.