TRIP REPORT: Croatia Airlines, London - Zagreb on A220

TRIP REPORT


Written by Jakov Fabinger 

Flight OU491 (codeshares OZ9383, SQ2403, UA7280)
London Heathrow (Terminal 2) to Zagreb
20:00-23:05
06.09.2024.
Price: £68 (discounted via third-party agent) one-way
Airbus A220-300 (9A-CAE)
Economy 117/134 (87%)
Business 4/9 (44%)

I booked this flight in April and was absolutely delighted when the equipment was changed from an Airbus A320, which usually operates the Friday night rotation, to an Airbus A220 some time in July.

This was the first time ever for Croatia Airlines to deploy the A220 to London so the journey felt special. Unfortunately, the crew made no mention of this fact during the flight. Even the captain didn't mention the A220 during his mid-air announcement - but he talked about which countries' airspaces we were flying over and what cities were ahead of us. I found this disappointing.

When I sat down after boarding I noticed that everyone around me was talking about the aircraft. The family in front of me were asking each other if this was "that new aircraft that Croatia Airlines bought" and the passenger next to me asked the cabin crew whether the aircraft was newly delivered. It still amazes me that Croatia Airlines managed to create such excellent marketing about the A220 considering that it is only leasing the aircraft and not actually buying them.

Check in

The Croatia Airlines mobile app is in urgent need of improvement. It is not possible to save a booking onto the app, so each time you wish to manage a booking you need to type in the booking reference and your surname. I also had to select my cookie preferences each time.

The seat selection for Economy class passengers is free at check in. Otherwise it's a minimum of 12 euros.


Something really helpful was that the mobile boarding pass updated itself automatically within my iPhone Wallet app each time there was a change to the boarding time and when the gate was assigned. I wish more airlines had this.


At the airport

I arrived at Heathrow 45 minutes before my flight because I had no hold luggage and because this flight absolutely never leaves on time. I would have arrived even later but Heathrow has a zero tolerance policy on late arrivals and the gates at security control will not let you through if you arrive any later than 35 minutes before your flight. This is a hard deadline and staff cannot override it so I never mess around with my journey to Heathrow. They won't let you through even if the flight is showing as delayed.

The reason why Croatia Airlines' Heathrow-Zagreb flight is always delayed is both because the turnover in Heathrow is just 45 minutes long and because Croatia Airlines has an absurdly short scheduled flight duration on its London rotation. It is simply impossible for the flight to arrive back in Zagreb on time. It literally never does.

As a comparison, British Airways schedules the Heathrow-Zagreb flight as 02:20 minutes long while Croatia Airlines schedules it as 02:05 minutes. For Zagreb-Heathrow, British Airways schedules 02:35 minutes (Sundays 5 minutes shorter) while Croatia Airlines schedules only 02:20 minutes. This means that British Airways has a whole extra 30 minutes to be on time for the Zagreb-Heathrow rotation than Croatia Airlines.

The Monday and Friday evening rotations from Zagreb to London are also always delayed because the aircraft waits for connecting passengers before leaving Zagreb. Connections from Zadar/Pula, Sarajevo and Split are usually manageable, but the connecting passengers from Dubrovnik always delay the London rotation because their connecting time is just 40 minutes. Furthermore, it's almost always the same aircraft that operates the Dubrovnik rotation and the subsequent London rotation, and there is simply not enough time for a timely turnover in Zagreb. On the day of my flight, the A220 landed in Zagreb from Dubrovnik at 17:30 while the scheduled departure for the Zagreb-London flight is 17:55.

Croatia Airlines was informing us about the delay by email and by text messages, which was not helpful because the delay kept growing and their operations centre should have given us more accurate delay estimates early on. The original delay estimate was just 30 minutes but ultimately we arrived 90 minutes late.

Because I knew the delay would inevitably be more than an hour long, I went to the Plaza Premium lounge. This is the best non-airline lounge in Heathrow as it was recently renovated. The food options are pretty poor though, as is standard for UK lounges with the exception of maybe Edinburgh and Bristol.



Our flight delay increased three times, the last time being due to a systems failure at Heathrow which prevented three passengers from boarding. Most passengers boarded the aircraft and then waited a further 20 minutes for the three affected passengers to be allowed to board.

Thus, our overall delay on arrival in Zagreb was 1.5 hours long. This is, sadly, not at all unusual for Croatia Airlines' Heathrow-Zagreb flights on Mondays and Fridays.


Boarding

Croatia Airlines has not had its own Croatian-speaking agents at Heathrow for a few years now, and all airport work at Heathrow is outsourced. The last time I remember speaking Croatian to staff was in 2019.

Boarding was smooth and pretty quick. Croatia Airlines allows two bags on board and, even though there are weight and size restrictions, I have never seen this checked by the gate agents. This was the case even today despite the flight being fairly full. The overhead locker space on the A220 is truly so fantastic that there was no need to place anyone's large wheelie bags in the hold.





The A220

The best thing about the A220 is that it is just so quiet, especially during take-off. My next favourite aspect of it are the USB-C charging points and the fact that they were turned on the entire time. In contrast, British Airways turns off its charging points at all times except when the flight is at cruising altitude.

I also really liked the adjustable head rest area as I am too tall to be able to make use of it otherwise. The 2-3 layout is also special and makes the cabin feel a bit less crowded even when it's full. Lastly, the windows are truly excellent: they are so large that you really get a good view. I was seated in the window seat, on the left-hand side.







However, I wasn't impressed with everything. I felt really cramped throughout the flight. The window seat is not so bad on the A320 but it really is tight on this A220. The width of the seats is also tight. I am tall but I am not wide, and I still felt really cramped. I deliberately didn't choose an emergency exit row seat as I wanted to be in the front of Economy, but retrospectively I felt that this was a mistake. If I had not put both my bags up in the overhead locker space I would have seriously struggled.

What I found interesting was that the middle seat in the very last row exists even though it is permanently out of service.


The toilet is very nice and highly spacious, but there is only one in the back and so there was a queue for it throughout the entire flight.

The flight

The flight was fully fine and fully ordinary. The crew were very nice and smiley, which hasn't always been the case on my Croatia Airlines flights in the past. They also apologised for the delay multiple times, which I didn't always have before.


We were served a packet of crackers with wine and sage, and were given a choice of still or mineral water. This is a considerable downgrade compared to what Croatia Airlines was offering before. Just five years ago it was possible to have multiple glasses of wine and eat cheese, Istrian sausage and crackers with olives completely for free.


E-journals are now a free feature for Croatia Airlines passengers, and the selection is reasonably good. There are both English-language and Croatian magazines.



Another welcome novelty is WiFi which Croatia Airlines offers on the A220. It is free to use messaging apps for the first 10 minutes. After that the prices are very high and, in my view, simply not worth it for a 2-hour flight.



Overall, I was really happy to be on this A220 flight, but I am also very happy that my next OU491 flight later this month is scheduled to be operated by an Airbus A320. Don't get me wrong - the A220 is so much better than a Dash, ATR or a CRJ aircraft, but it felt just a little too cramped compared to an Airbus A320 family aircraft or a Boeing 737 MAX.


Share your travel experience by submitting a trip report to exyu@exyuaviation.com


Comments

  1. Anonymous08:39

    Great trip report. OU A220 looking good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:47

      Bravo Croatia Airlines 🇭🇷 ! Perfect aircraft, OU is future AirBaltic of Adriatic Sea!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:53

      Yes especially when it comes to the financial performance

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Awesome trip report. I think USB-C chargers are thing that single-handedly improved flying experience over the past 10 years across the board. Especially long-haul, because even if I don’t use it, I have a feeling my phone battery drains twice the usual speed when in air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jakov Fabinger10:15

      I agree, the USB-A chargers are just too weak. Plus, my iPhone charging cable is USB-C to USB-C so unless the aircraft has a whole socket I cannot even charge my phone on USB-A. Hopefully more airlines will bring in USB-C chargers.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:14

    Thank you for this so good report

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous09:14

    Interesting trip report but I am not surprised that they replaced the A320 with A220 when they had only 117 economy class passengers. I think Ryanair is eating them alive on ZAG-LON market.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jakov Fabinger10:18

      Correct. My flight back to London tonight is with Ryanair and it is sold out since yesterday. And that's on an A320 with no Business Class. Plus, Ryanair actually has two flights to London today - and they are both sold out!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:22

      Is FR much cheaper on the route?

      Delete
    3. Jakov Fabinger10:33

      It depends on when you book and when your flight is. Ryanair is cheaper if you book far in advance, in the winter, or in the middle of the week. But Croatia Airlines is often cheaper for last-minute flights because Ryanair puts up ticket prices rapidly as occupancy starts nearing 100% while Croatia Airlines almost never gets there. So Ryanair has much more pricing variability which means Croatia Airlines tickets can be found for cheaper.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:10

      I read somewhere that FR is increasing ZAG-STN to 10 weekly. Once that happens both BA and OU are done.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous13:14

      Yes, it goes up in October. Tuesday becomes double daily.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous15:29

      They are running over their competition. Time for OU & BA to fight back

      Delete
    7. Anonymous18:40

      British Airways is struggling for two reasons: Ryanair took both P2P traffic as well as transfer traffic to Dublin.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous21:30

      With just 4 slots left at LHR I think it won't be long before OU sells them.

      Delete
  5. A220 looks realu good! BTW You must be brave to arrive 45 minutes before scheduled departure at Heathrow. 😉

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jakov Fabinger10:28

      I know but I just can't stand waiting for hours at the airport and I knew the flight would be delayed. I actually aimed to arrive at -60 and got a bit delayed so I only walked in at -45. So I did leave a buffer!

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:39

    This must be a really silly question but does Croatia Airlines have mood lighting on their A220s? On these photos I noticed just white lights so I was wondering if anyone has been on their A220 and can report on this? Again, its a really silly question but I am curious haha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      If JU has them on their ATRs then I am sure OU has them on the A220!

      Delete
    2. Jakov Fabinger10:36

      I was surprised that the only lighting we had during the flight was either bright white or dimmed white or no lights at all. There was no change of colour to the lighting. I found the white lights too clinical and too bright for a late night flight.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:47

    The font used on the in flight magazine should be used on the aircraft fuselage

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      +1

      Delete
    2. Jakov Fabinger10:37

      And there should be no underscore. I still don't get why they included that.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous10:21

    Why is one seat permanently out of service?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      Weight and balance

      Delete
    2. Vlad21:47

      AF doesn't block that seat on any of their A220s, curious that OU has to.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous10:48

    "Overall, I was really happy to be on this A220 flight, but I am also very happy that my next OU491 flight later this month is scheduled to be operated by an Airbus A320. Don't get me wrong - the A220 is so much better than a Dash, ATR or a CRJ aircraft, but it felt just a little too cramped compared to an Airbus A320 family aircraft or a Boeing 737 MAX. "

    Very interesting comment at the end. Never flew the A220 but I'm glad that you were frank and honest about the cabin comfort.

    Thank for the nice report btw!😀✈️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:06

      Thanks! I wasn't expecting to feel like that to be honest. I thought it would be much better than an A320neo or a MAX, but it wasn't.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:57

      You have thousands of other trip reports who say otherwise.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:29

      Thousands? I doubt it.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:39

      Ok.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous10:52

    The cabin looks fantastic. Btw must say that I miss your articles at Simple Flying

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:03

      Thanks! 😅 I miss the early days of it too. It became a very different place to work for after we were bought by a Canadian multinational corporation.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous13:14

    Thanks for the report! Great photos too.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous13:31

    Great reports and cabin looks great. I have one peeve though. I notice on a photo OU recently posted that they don't have a proper wall divider between business and economy and used a scrunched up curtain
    https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4D22AQG3ky2btM3S6Q/feedshare-shrink_2048_1536/feedshare-shrink_2048_1536/0/1725792304393?e=1728518400&v=beta&t=s243mxI9ZDnnJPK1Or_5bItlueKMFhMcaacMvaBfwp0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jakov Fabinger18:41

      It was the same on my flight.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous19:28

      So whats the problem whit that?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous21:30

      Well as a regular business class passenger I like to have my privacy!

      Delete
  13. Anonymous17:26

    You mentioned some passengers talking and questioning if this was that new aircraft. Wondering if they were from UK or Croatia? Did they speak English or Croatian? Thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:54

      Maybe they were transfers to SJJ or SKP

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:57

      This flight does not connect onto either of those.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:15

      Doubt they were English speaking. Marketing campaign was delivered to domestic market, same one where airline has been losing marketshare to other airlines. Good to hear domestic market is aware of A220 but highly doubtful that awareness will reverse marketshare slide

      Delete
    4. Anonymous18:43

      @17:57 Correct, the Monday and Friday night from London to Zagreb does not carry any transfer traffic because it lands in Zagreb later than all regional evening wave flights depart.

      The passengers were all Croatian actually. They must have heard in the media that Croatia Airlines was getting new planes and they probably noticed that this must be it. The aircraft definitely looks very different from the inside than the A320 family aircraft do. And it also looks fresh and new.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous18:44

      (Sorry, the above comment should have gone under the name of Jakov Fabinger)

      Delete
    6. Anonymous21:31

      Issue is that OU chose the cheapest variant so many things could be better but they cost more.

      Delete
  14. You got a very decent price for this flight.
    Great trip report!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous18:15

    You come 45 min prior to the flight at LHR ?? When are you then coming if you fly from LJU, 5 min prior тo departure time ?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous20:09

    Nothing special here ........ just like an expected regular scheduled bus service, same all over the world ............ its the 2020s not the 1960s ......

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous20:12

    If OU wanted to make an impact it should have aquired A320 XLRs and A330s and left the bus service to european towns to some budget airline .....

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.