Air Serbia to reduce Chicago service

NEWS FLASH


Air Serbia will reduce frequencies on its service between Belgrade and Chicago during the first quarter of 2025. The carrier will operate one weekly rotation between the two cities, on Fridays departing Belgrade, and Saturdays, departing Chicago, from January 17 until March 31, instead of the initially planned two weekly rotations. Two weekly flights will be maintained up until January 17. Frequencies will be restored to three weekly for the 2025 summer season. The carrier had previously said the route has high seasonality, with significantly softer demand during the winter months.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:34

    Seasonality on that route hurts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee11:21

      They should just fly in summer, no need for winter flights.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:58

      Their prices on both JFK and ORD are very high compared to other airlines, especially when connecting from secondary cities in the US.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:25

      The fact that they do not have codeshares with any US carrier from ORD makes things more difficult.
      Unlike JFK B6 is non existent in ORD.

      Delete
    4. I tried to book a flight from ORD to BEG several times as I fly frequently to North America. The prices were always a minimum $500 more expensive per person imagine trying to book for a family of 4.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous15:13

      I often take tgat flight from BNA with AA and it is always the cheapest and best connection. Ones a week during that time it is ok . Before JU from ORD we use to Fly LOT with 2 connection and their flights were more money but half empty so I would often get a row to myself.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous15:35

      Anonymous14:26, what other airline was $500 cheaper for nonstop ORD-BEG flights you booked? You never heard of 1 or 2-stop always being more expensive than nonstop?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous15:35

      ^..being less expensive...

      Delete
    8. Nenad19:43

      @Anonymous 14:26
      I'm buying tickets now.
      Swiss 58.445 RSD,
      LOT - 68.659 RSD,
      AirSerbia RSD 102.289.
      The difference is 43.844 RSD.
      So Buying three tickets, 3 * 43.844 = 131.532 RSD.
      Buying the same dates Saturday - Saturday the difference is not that big, around 24.000 per ticket. Still, big enough.
      You get the picture.
      I do not earn enough so to be able to ignore the difference.
      To me it makes sense to take a flight that is about three hours longer, and save 131.532 RSD. Even when AirSerbia charges up to 200$ more per ticket I fly them. However, this is too much. Flying even during low months, LOT flight are full, while AirSerbia - not so much. You can understand why.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous20:05

      Air Serbia is nonstop, all others are connecting flights. There is always premium to be paid for direct service.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous20:30

      zato ce na kraju i ugasiti liniju ne radi im IFE skuplji 400-500$ od konkurencije, oni misle mi ovde beremo pare na grani. ne bi bila sezonska linija kada bi bili konkurentniji sa cenama dosta ljudi koje znam nece sa njima bas zbog cene i van sezone ali to je njihova politika

      Delete
    11. Anonymous21:15

      20:30 another analiticar's copycat expert

      Delete
    12. Anonymous00:36

      nije expert nego neko ko je leteo pre mesec dana za chicago sa njima u biznis klasi gde ceo let u celoj biznis klasi IFE ne radi ne znam za ekonomiju da li je radio. neko ko za 20 dana ponovo dolazi za bg ali ovog puta sa KLM-om sto su od mene uzimali pare uzimali su

      Delete
    13. Anonymous00:47

      Столе све најбоље, чувајте паре и без нервирања.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous10:37

    From March 31, does it jump from once weekly to three weekly, or will threre be a period whrere they go two weekly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:37

      It jumps from 1 to 3 weekly.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous11:38

    No matter, it’s good to know JU try to sustain this route over winter at least once a week.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous13:15

    JU planning& research department is a real mess

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does it make sense to run Cuba or Africa (Zanzibar) during the winter?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous13:39

    So apparently they chose ORD instead of YYZ because of the seasonality issue, just to learn that ORD is struggling during winter as well.

    I think the main issue here is not attracting many transfer passengers from the region, most of them still rather fly with LH or TK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:47

      without IFE and with broken seats it's understandable

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:55

      13:47 Not true, during the time schedule goes down to 1pw YU-ARC wil be out for cabin refit.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:01

      Well I don't see what's not true. They have been using aircraft with broken seats and no entertainment at all (YU-ARC) and an aircraft with broken seats and entertainment not working at many seats (YU-ARB) on all of their flights to Chicago.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:09

      It even took a while the JFK route with way better product on ARA to become successful.
      ORD is still fixable though, the real danger might come if JU downgrades it to the summer season.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous14:17

      The real danger is utilazing JU-ARC in this state cause people won't come back to that metal... And for many this will be the only long haul experience with JU so they'll reasonably think that Pupin is the company's standard and will skip the company whenever possible... Not one single person will percieve JU as an airline of choice for long haul with this product and in winter you see the results of not being the airline of choice.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous14:22

      With just 2 flights a week its hard to be the first choice for many passengers, both local and transfers when LH group, AFKL, TK and others offer daily flights to ORD, alliance membership and better hard and soft product.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous15:25

      14:01 entertainment not working at many seats (YU-ARB)

      Any proof? If not, it's lies all over again.

      Pointing finger at IFE issues at one out of three aircraft as a cause of frequency reduction to 1pw during January 17 until March 31 (when ARC will be out of service) is beyond nuts.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous15:30

      "All lìes over again"
      What has exactly been a lie regarding YU-ARC falling apart?

      My proof is actually flying on YU-ARB. On my seat I was getting audio from 2 rows ahead, while other passengers had to be moved because screen was not working.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous15:39

      LOL your actual flying with one audio issue (even if true) is NOT an evidence for this statement: entertainment not working at MANY SEATS (YU-ARB) .

      Thank you for confirming it's a lie.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous15:42

      I told you people were moved because their seatback tv was not working. I don't know if you are an Air Serbia employee or a die hard fan but I would suggest you actually use your money, pay for a ticket and see what a great experience it is flying YU-ARB. I guess for YU-ARC you accepted it is falling apart.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous15:43

      "regarding YU-ARC falling apart"

      Not falling appart, it would not be flying if not safe. Inop IFE and 5 seats that can't fully recline is NOT equal to falling apart. Stop lying

      Delete
    12. Anonymous15:48

      And still waiting to get evidence inop IFE and 5 functional seats without lie-flay are "understandably" reasons for ORD going down to 1 weekly LOL

      Delete
    13. Anonymous16:07

      Dzaba se natezes. Kabina jeste u uzasnom stanju i bila je na sva tri aviona takva (ARA, ARB, ARC). ARD jos nisam video ali se nadam da su se konacno dozvali pameti sa stanjem u kojem su im kabine pa su izabrali bolji avion.

      Delete
    14. Anonymous16:36

      ARA was older style but can completely refurbished and looked like new. ARB is fine. Minor issues with ARC cabin that was repetedly mentioned as undergoing complete cabing refurb is not the same as "falling apart" or cetrainly not the reason for frequency reduction. Those types of "facts" might be acceptable on some amateur blog devoted to going after Air Serbia.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous16:01

    Seems reports of low LF on these flights was true. I wonder if they will actually restore 3 weekly in the summer or go for less. Cant win them all, maybe better focus on China with a lot of European airlines dropping flights? Or Toronto.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:37

      Somehow you expect Toronto can be wining, based on what?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:41

      Going summer seasonal for example

      Delete
  8. Anonymous16:14

    Even BA from PDX to LHR i not going to fly 2 weeks in February and they do it 4 times a week. It's a lot of lost seats, but its very low demand, so many airlines are reducing february at least/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous17:05

    ANALiticar cant wait to post about this tonight. Huge news.
    Nije dobro...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:21

      As can be deducted from recent comments, some people can't stand the fact Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport now has 7 operating/announced year-round long-haul services while some other airports have 0:

      Hainan: PEK
      China Southern: CAN
      Air Serbia: JFK, ORD, TSN, CAN, PVG

      Delete
    2. Anonymous19:49

      I feel sorry for people that are self proclaimed "Analysts". 7 long haul routes hurts!

      Delete
  10. Anonymous17:57

    This will probably last while ARC is on cabin reburbishment

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous19:30

    So practically they will have 3 A330 during winter flying what, 7-8 long haul return flights per week?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:56

      They will fly from January:
      JFK 3pw
      ORD 1pw
      TSN 1pw
      CAN 2pw
      PVG 2pw

      So, thats 9pw in total. However, it needs to be noted that TSN, ORD and PVG will have aircraft on destination for more than 24 hours. When that comes into calculation three aircraft will have solid utilisation.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:12

      ^^^
      A330s sitting around at airports because of suboptimal planning of flights and frequencies is pretty far from "solid utilization".

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.