Serbia's Minister for Construction, Transport, and Infrastructure, Goran Vesić, has announced that discussions are underway with several low cost airlines regarding the establishment of a base at Niš Constantine the Great Airport. While the Minister did not name the airlines involved, it is believed that talks have been held with Wizz Air, Ryanair, and Eurowings, as well as a Turkish airline. "Representatives of [operator] Airports of Serbia have been negotiating for a number of weeks with several large low cost carriers for Niš to became a base for one of them. I hope we will succeed as the airport would handle up to 700.000, 800.000 or even a million passengers per year". Mr Vesić said.
The Minister also noted that discussions are ongoing with Air Serbia for the introduction of a new service from Niš, which would not be subsidised by the state, as opposed to the existing seven which are maintained as part of a Public Service Obligation (PSO) contract. “Very soon Air Serbia will launch a new commercial service from Niš. We are in discussions over those flights. It will not be a subsidised route but one based on commercial terms”, Mr Vesić said. The carrier currently maintains services from the southeast Serbian city to Belgrade, Cologne, Hahn, Istanbul, and Ljubljana, as well as seasonally to Athens and Tivat. It also runs a number of summer charters.
All of Air Serbia’s scheduled services out of Niš are subsidised based as part of its PSO contract. The value of the ongoing four-year contract, which also includes services from Kraljevo to Istanbul and Tivat, amounts to 34 million euros. Air Serbia has attempted to add flights from Niš in the past, outside of its PSO obligations. In the winter of 2022/23, it introduced a limited service from Constantine the Great Airport to Zurich. However, the flights were cut short due to insufficient demand. Last year, the airline invested in the opening of a new call centre, as well as an aircraft balancing service department in the city. Furthermore, it has said it would open a “special business lounge” within Niš Airport’s new terminal building.
Despite a record 2023, Niš Airport has been hit by sliding passenger numbers during the first three quarters of this year. This is primarily because of fewer flights operated by the airport’s two other carriers - Wizz Air and Ryanair. During the January - September period, Niš Airport handled a combined total of 282.869 travellers, down 20.4% on 2023. It comes on the back of a 36.3% reduction in the number of flights by Wizz Air, and an 12.3% reduction in the number of operations by Ryanair over the same period.
Must be Wizz Air
ReplyDeleteEW is possible too. FR has no bases outside EU other than UK and Morocco so I doubt it will be them.
DeleteWho knows. Ryanair will have extra capacity after they decimated Germany ops.
DeleteIt won't because of late deliveries by Boeing.
DeleteSofia es EU
DeleteSofia is in Bulgaria and Bulgaria is in the EU since 2007!!!!
DeleteEW has a plane based in Pristina right? I think EW is a serious contender for INI too.
DeleteNo they haven't, EW only EU bases. Any of the Turkish LCC airline is not possible due to lack of 5th freedom, unless you want to fly to Turkiye only. It's either Wizz as someone said most likely or Ryan, less likely. In the end maybe I wouldn't be suprised if noone opens, which would be sad but still possible.
DeleteFinally. This is good news
ReplyDeleteEurowings could be an interesting choice
ReplyDeleteWhat could the new Air Serbia route be?
ReplyDeleteMy money is on Vienna
DeleteAnd compete against Ryan's Bratislava? Don't think so
DeleteAnd compete against Ryan's Bratislava? Don't think so
DeleteRyanair does not fly Nis-Bratislava
DeleteIt is CDG
DeleteRyanair flies to Vienna
Delete@9.42 really hope so.
DeleteAny idea when it could launch? This winter or next summer?
DeleteIf Zurich couldn't work for Air Serbia (and it didn't work for Swiss either), then I really don't see many routes being able to turn a profit from Nis. That is probably the reason the LCCs are also reducing flights
ReplyDeleteRyanair decrease is negligible. Wizz Air decrease is due to engine issues.
DeleteThey opened line Niš-Zurich with abnormal ticket price. No wo der it failed.
DeleteSwiss also had abnormal prices?
DeleteThe Zurich route was as aviation was recovering in Serbia and Europe from Covid. Its a different time now which can have a different result. also if JU uses the Embraer on this route could be better.
DeleteThis is like saying, if OU couldn't make BCN year-long from Zagreb then Ryan has no chance with any other route. Meanwhile, they launched more routes than OU in decades long Zagreb operations. Give an attractive offer and the flights will happen. Wait for the airline to call you and you will have no new routes. As simple as that.
DeleteI'm sure there are many unserved routes from Nis which would turn a profit.
Delete^ History shows not so much
DeleteZurich route was very successful for Swiss. Planes were always full, and sometimes they had to use A321 too. The problem was after Covid when Swiss started facing issue with lack of workers. Swiss started with 2 weekly flights and then increased to 3 weekly. All always. full. So, before all of you, before making any conclusion to show that Nis doesn't have a potential, inform yourself properly. Don't talk nonsense.
DeleteAnonymous18:44 Charging €600 for a one-way trip from Niš to Zurich, as Air Serbia once attempted, is clearly not a sustainable approach. To be competitive, especially with low-cost carriers, they must offer more reasonable fares. A price point of €150 would be much more acceptable, but €600 for a single trip is simply too high.
DeleteI would love to see JU passenger numbers on Belgrade-Nis route. Anyway happy to see they will also add new route. Maybe it will be Zurich again but now with ATR72?
ReplyDeleteAnd maybe with an Embraer.
DeleteIt would be interesting to see how many passengers each of the three airlines at INI carries each month.
Delete@anon 8:19 I fly fairly often INI-BEG because I don't have a car, the numbers are miserable. In the summer 20-40 passengers, outside of that 5-20 passengers per flights.
DeleteBut we can't blame it on people, as someone said, make it double or triple daily, make it connect to all the flights from BEG, do some proper, proper marketing and the people will come.
Considering its purely a positioning flight, that no one knows about it and that it does not connect onto anything, that's not so bad
DeleteThat’s ferry flights, it doesn’t matter how many passengers are there. Although, I think Air Serbia should connect all nearby airports with double daily flights with some small planes
DeleteThey could do some minimal marketing and make a buck.
DeleteCould have been done years ago but better late than never.
ReplyDeleteThey were close when city was running the airport. Then the state took over and pumped 2019 numbers through Air Serbia PSO while numbers on Ryanair and Wizz fell.
DeleteShame.
DeleteThis was to be expected. Who else are they upgrading the airport for.
ReplyDeleteWell the terminal and new infranstricture has to be paid off somehow so it makes sense.
DeleteActually the next phase which was recently announced will have to be paid from 2027 onwards. They don't pay anything to the Chinese until then when it is expected to be completeted
DeleteHow many routes could we get if LCC bases 1 plane?
ReplyDelete4 I would say
DeleteAnywhere better 5 and 14, assuming all flights would be operated by the based aircraft. Really depends on flight distance, when the airports are open, how much they are utilising the plane, etc.
Delete@ anon 08:32 - for 4 you don't need to base a plane
Delete@anon 08:24 - if you take that a route is started with 2 flights per week, and a company has at least 3 flights per day, that makes 21 flights per week. so, at least 10 routes. but as @anon 09:23 said, it all depends on destinations, flight distance ets. as for INI opening hours, it will switch to 24/7 if a company bases a plane
Any idea what is Nis's busiest unserved route?
ReplyDeleteProbably Zurich
DeleteYeah thats why they discontinued it.
DeleteThey discontinued it since it started in the middle of the pandemoc in winter.
Delete*pandemic
DeleteAbout time.
ReplyDeleteWhich routes could be launched?
ReplyDeleteParis BVA and Berlin BER have huge potential, eventually another German route or Italian.
DeleteAhhh Paris BVA, the worst airport I've ever been in my life, and I've been on many across all continents.
DeleteDo LCCs in Niš still have just a 3 euro charge for handling?
ReplyDeleteI think that ended because they had 3 year contracts. But not 100% sure
DeleteI don't get JU's plans for a Nis airport lounge when they don't sell business class from there
ReplyDeleteWell, that is quite simple: they plan to.
DeleteA JU business lounge in Niš would be a complete waste of money.
DeleteExactly. Makes no sense
DeleteSa Embaerom ima smisla ponovo pokušati Cirih, pritom životni standard je mnogo veći nego pre 3 godine i ljudi više putuju.
ReplyDeleteDidn't Swiss fly with Helvetic Air Embraers?
DeleteIdemo dalje...
ReplyDeleteNow that the government is so deeply involved in developments at INI, I would prefer if they just scrap all the AirSerbia PSO flights and excahnge them for a double or triple daily to Belgrade on an ATR. That way we could connect onto AirSerbia's BEG waves and have much better connectivity to Europe and the World, plus AirSerbia and BEG would benefit as well. I suspect over time, when people get used to this, it would even become profitable and sustainable. Besides this, they should let any other airline fly freely from INI if they want to, et voila!
ReplyDeleteFlights to the Netherlands!
ReplyDeletemy 2 cents, it will be either Lauda or Wizz
ReplyDeletePlease anyone but wizz. And the bts route needs to come back, it used to be jammed pack with ppl who work in Slovakia factories and tickets were like 7 eurs lol Also fr needs to get a competition on the vie route immediately
ReplyDeleteRyan flies to Vienna from Niš for 14.99€
DeleteUsed to be 3.99 back when they had wizz flying to vienna too
DeleteKad/ako bude bila izgrađena pruga između Beograda i Niša, vrlo rado bih koristio Niš za LLC letove
ReplyDeleteIf it's W6 (the most realistic) or FR (not so realistic), here is the list of possible destinations, in addition to already existing ones:
ReplyDelete- Paris (BVA)
- Geteborg
- Copenhagen
- Karlsruhe
- Hamburg / Hannover
- Bergamo
- Rome (CIA)
- Treviso
- Eindhoven
- Charleroi
- Oslo Torp
- Athens
I don't see any of the leisure destinations working out (yet), so Spain, Portugal, Greek islands, southern Italy and similar destinations are out of the question for the time being.
Fingers crossed for this development.
It would be a lot more successful if flights were to ORL vs BVA, BRY vs CRL, AMS vs EIN.
DeleteNot sure about it, the mentioned airports are infinitely more expensive and INI struggles with costs and yields as it is.
DeleteNo question about it that those airports are better and more convenient, but at this point in time it is simply not doable imho.
Very nice.
ReplyDeleteI guess the Pegasus is in talks as that Turkish airline. But are there any bilateral limitaions?
ReplyDeleteThere are. They can only.fly to/from Turkey and even that is limited to political agreement. But maybe it's Pegasus' planned Romanian AOC.
DeleteWhen is that supposed to launch?
DeleteAMS flights needed
ReplyDeleteLol
DeleteMaybe Transavia :D
ReplyDeleteThey don't have bases outside Nethetlands and France.
DeletePity
DeleteSo we could expect new routes next year?
ReplyDeleteYes
DeleteLet's hope, Nothing is guaranteed.
DeleteDuring the first PSO contract from Nis, Air Serbia had 12 destinations. Maybe some of the ones that didn't make the cut for the second PSO contract will be launched by LCC.
ReplyDeleteSome of them made sense - Nuremberg, Karlsruhe, Ljubljana and some of them were flat out terrible - like Budapest and to lesser extent Rome for example.
DeleteLjubljana is still operated.
DeleteBudapest was only added to stop Wizz from launching the flights as under PSO rules they would be unable to launch it.
DeleteWe are all well aware of that, but that was malicious and served no one and no purpose - JU flew empty with 3 or 4 passengers on board and W6 did not start flying, thus preventing citizens from south of Serbia having access to a wide W6 network from BUD.
DeleteWell Wizz Air, if it wanted to, could have launched the Budapest route for over 4 years now. It didn't (and all those years before Air Serbia operated flights for 6 months or less).
DeleteWhat about changing management which can't provide new flights? That's Minister's responsibility, not talking with airlines about flights.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteLong overdue
DeleteBergamooo, please!
ReplyDeleteCDG makes most sense for new Air Serbia destination.
ReplyDeleteAnd as for LCC base, Wizz is the obvious choice.
DeleteKad vidiš po komentarima kolko imamo vazduhoplovnih stručnjaka čudim se kako nismo Švajcarska na Balkanu
ReplyDeleteBlago tebi.
DeleteCan't wait to see which airline it will be.
ReplyDeleteAt the opening of the airport terminal, they announced subsidies, but now they are only talking about negotiations. Honestly, I don't think any of them will agree to that as long as they keep pouring subsidies into Air Serbia and creates an unnatural competition that the government has implemented at the airport. I wish I am wrong
Delete