State in talks with several LCCs over Niš Airport base


Serbia's Minister for Construction, Transport, and Infrastructure, Goran Vesić, has announced that discussions are underway with several low cost airlines regarding the establishment of a base at Niš Constantine the Great Airport. While the Minister did not name the airlines involved, it is believed that talks have been held with Wizz Air, Ryanair, and Eurowings, as well as a Turkish airline. "Representatives of [operator] Airports of Serbia have been negotiating for a number of weeks with several large low cost carriers for Niš to became a base for one of them. I hope we will succeed as the airport would handle up to 700.000, 800.000 or even a million passengers per year". Mr Vesić said.

The Minister also noted that discussions are ongoing with Air Serbia for the introduction of a new service from Niš, which would not be subsidised by the state, as opposed to the existing seven which are maintained as part of a Public Service Obligation (PSO) contract. “Very soon Air Serbia will launch a new commercial service from Niš. We are in discussions over those flights. It will not be a subsidised route but one based on commercial terms”, Mr Vesić said. The carrier currently maintains services from the southeast Serbian city to Belgrade, Cologne, Hahn, Istanbul, and Ljubljana, as well as seasonally to Athens and Tivat. It also runs a number of summer charters.

All of Air Serbia’s scheduled services out of Niš are subsidised based as part of its PSO contract. The value of the ongoing four-year contract, which also includes services from Kraljevo to Istanbul and Tivat, amounts to 34 million euros. Air Serbia has attempted to add flights from Niš in the past, outside of its PSO obligations. In the winter of 2022/23, it introduced a limited service from Constantine the Great Airport to Zurich. However, the flights were cut short due to insufficient demand. Last year, the airline invested in the opening of a new call centre, as well as an aircraft balancing service department in the city. Furthermore, it has said it would open a “special business lounge” within Niš Airport’s new terminal building.

Despite a record 2023, Niš Airport has been hit by sliding passenger numbers during the first three quarters of this year. This is primarily because of fewer flights operated by the airport’s two other carriers - Wizz Air and Ryanair. During the January - September period, Niš Airport handled a combined total of 282.869 travellers, down 20.4% on 2023. It comes on the back of a 36.3% reduction in the number of flights by Wizz Air, and an 12.3% reduction in the number of operations by Ryanair over the same period.



Comments

  1. Anonymous08:06

    Must be Wizz Air

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:15

      EW is possible too. FR has no bases outside EU other than UK and Morocco so I doubt it will be them.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:24

      Who knows. Ryanair will have extra capacity after they decimated Germany ops.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:22

      It won't because of late deliveries by Boeing.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:18

      Sofia es EU

      Delete
    5. Anonymous13:17

      Sofia is in Bulgaria and Bulgaria is in the EU since 2007!!!!

      Delete
    6. Anonymous18:46

      EW has a plane based in Pristina right? I think EW is a serious contender for INI too.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous21:15

      No they haven't, EW only EU bases. Any of the Turkish LCC airline is not possible due to lack of 5th freedom, unless you want to fly to Turkiye only. It's either Wizz as someone said most likely or Ryan, less likely. In the end maybe I wouldn't be suprised if noone opens, which would be sad but still possible.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous08:06

    Finally. This is good news

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous08:08

    Eurowings could be an interesting choice

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous08:14

    What could the new Air Serbia route be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:26

      My money is on Vienna

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:28

      And compete against Ryan's Bratislava? Don't think so

      Delete
    3. Anonymous08:28

      And compete against Ryan's Bratislava? Don't think so

      Delete
    4. Anonymous08:33

      Ryanair does not fly Nis-Bratislava

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:42

      It is CDG

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:30

      Ryanair flies to Vienna

      Delete
    7. Anonymous18:44

      @9.42 really hope so.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous18:45

      Any idea when it could launch? This winter or next summer?

      Delete
  5. Anonymous08:15

    If Zurich couldn't work for Air Serbia (and it didn't work for Swiss either), then I really don't see many routes being able to turn a profit from Nis. That is probably the reason the LCCs are also reducing flights

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:17

      Ryanair decrease is negligible. Wizz Air decrease is due to engine issues.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:28

      They opened line Niš-Zurich with abnormal ticket price. No wo der it failed.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous08:32

      Swiss also had abnormal prices?

      Delete
    4. The Zurich route was as aviation was recovering in Serbia and Europe from Covid. Its a different time now which can have a different result. also if JU uses the Embraer on this route could be better.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:34

      This is like saying, if OU couldn't make BCN year-long from Zagreb then Ryan has no chance with any other route. Meanwhile, they launched more routes than OU in decades long Zagreb operations. Give an attractive offer and the flights will happen. Wait for the airline to call you and you will have no new routes. As simple as that.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous14:41

      I'm sure there are many unserved routes from Nis which would turn a profit.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous18:44

      ^ History shows not so much

      Delete
    8. Anonymous10:29

      Zurich route was very successful for Swiss. Planes were always full, and sometimes they had to use A321 too. The problem was after Covid when Swiss started facing issue with lack of workers. Swiss started with 2 weekly flights and then increased to 3 weekly. All always. full. So, before all of you, before making any conclusion to show that Nis doesn't have a potential, inform yourself properly. Don't talk nonsense.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous12:17

      Anonymous18:44 Charging €600 for a one-way trip from Niš to Zurich, as Air Serbia once attempted, is clearly not a sustainable approach. To be competitive, especially with low-cost carriers, they must offer more reasonable fares. A price point of €150 would be much more acceptable, but €600 for a single trip is simply too high.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous08:19

    I would love to see JU passenger numbers on Belgrade-Nis route. Anyway happy to see they will also add new route. Maybe it will be Zurich again but now with ATR72?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      And maybe with an Embraer.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous14:47

      It would be interesting to see how many passengers each of the three airlines at INI carries each month.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:35

      @anon 8:19 I fly fairly often INI-BEG because I don't have a car, the numbers are miserable. In the summer 20-40 passengers, outside of that 5-20 passengers per flights.

      But we can't blame it on people, as someone said, make it double or triple daily, make it connect to all the flights from BEG, do some proper, proper marketing and the people will come.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:45

      Considering its purely a positioning flight, that no one knows about it and that it does not connect onto anything, that's not so bad

      Delete
    5. Anonymous17:12

      That’s ferry flights, it doesn’t matter how many passengers are there. Although, I think Air Serbia should connect all nearby airports with double daily flights with some small planes

      Delete
    6. Anonymous18:43

      They could do some minimal marketing and make a buck.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous08:20

    Could have been done years ago but better late than never.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:48

      They were close when city was running the airport. Then the state took over and pumped 2019 numbers through Air Serbia PSO while numbers on Ryanair and Wizz fell.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:43

      Shame.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous08:21

    This was to be expected. Who else are they upgrading the airport for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:48

      Well the terminal and new infranstricture has to be paid off somehow so it makes sense.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:42

      Actually the next phase which was recently announced will have to be paid from 2027 onwards. They don't pay anything to the Chinese until then when it is expected to be completeted

      Delete
  9. Anonymous08:24

    How many routes could we get if LCC bases 1 plane?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:32

      4 I would say

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:23

      Anywhere better 5 and 14, assuming all flights would be operated by the based aircraft. Really depends on flight distance, when the airports are open, how much they are utilising the plane, etc.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:12

      @ anon 08:32 - for 4 you don't need to base a plane

      @anon 08:24 - if you take that a route is started with 2 flights per week, and a company has at least 3 flights per day, that makes 21 flights per week. so, at least 10 routes. but as @anon 09:23 said, it all depends on destinations, flight distance ets. as for INI opening hours, it will switch to 24/7 if a company bases a plane

      Delete
  10. Anonymous08:25

    Any idea what is Nis's busiest unserved route?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:27

      Probably Zurich

      Delete
    2. Anonymous14:38

      Yeah thats why they discontinued it.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:49

      They discontinued it since it started in the middle of the pandemoc in winter.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:50

      *pandemic

      Delete
  11. Anonymous08:25

    About time.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous08:25

    Which routes could be launched?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      Paris BVA and Berlin BER have huge potential, eventually another German route or Italian.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:27

      Ahhh Paris BVA, the worst airport I've ever been in my life, and I've been on many across all continents.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous08:32

    Do LCCs in Niš still have just a 3 euro charge for handling?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:41

      I think that ended because they had 3 year contracts. But not 100% sure

      Delete
  14. Anonymous08:34

    I don't get JU's plans for a Nis airport lounge when they don't sell business class from there

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Well, that is quite simple: they plan to.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:58

      A JU business lounge in Niš would be a complete waste of money.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:38

      Exactly. Makes no sense

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:12

    Sa Embaerom ima smisla ponovo pokušati Cirih, pritom životni standard je mnogo veći nego pre 3 godine i ljudi više putuju.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:40

      Didn't Swiss fly with Helvetic Air Embraers?

      Delete
  16. Anonymous09:13

    Idemo dalje...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:23

    Now that the government is so deeply involved in developments at INI, I would prefer if they just scrap all the AirSerbia PSO flights and excahnge them for a double or triple daily to Belgrade on an ATR. That way we could connect onto AirSerbia's BEG waves and have much better connectivity to Europe and the World, plus AirSerbia and BEG would benefit as well. I suspect over time, when people get used to this, it would even become profitable and sustainable. Besides this, they should let any other airline fly freely from INI if they want to, et voila!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous11:03

    Flights to the Netherlands!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous11:13

    my 2 cents, it will be either Lauda or Wizz

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous11:27

    Please anyone but wizz. And the bts route needs to come back, it used to be jammed pack with ppl who work in Slovakia factories and tickets were like 7 eurs lol Also fr needs to get a competition on the vie route immediately

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:32

      Ryan flies to Vienna from Niš for 14.99€

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:22

      Used to be 3.99 back when they had wizz flying to vienna too

      Delete
  21. Anonymous12:13

    Kad/ako bude bila izgrađena pruga između Beograda i Niša, vrlo rado bih koristio Niš za LLC letove

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous12:30

    If it's W6 (the most realistic) or FR (not so realistic), here is the list of possible destinations, in addition to already existing ones:

    - Paris (BVA)
    - Geteborg
    - Copenhagen
    - Karlsruhe
    - Hamburg / Hannover
    - Bergamo
    - Rome (CIA)
    - Treviso
    - Eindhoven
    - Charleroi
    - Oslo Torp
    - Athens

    I don't see any of the leisure destinations working out (yet), so Spain, Portugal, Greek islands, southern Italy and similar destinations are out of the question for the time being.

    Fingers crossed for this development.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      It would be a lot more successful if flights were to ORL vs BVA, BRY vs CRL, AMS vs EIN.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:25

      Not sure about it, the mentioned airports are infinitely more expensive and INI struggles with costs and yields as it is.

      No question about it that those airports are better and more convenient, but at this point in time it is simply not doable imho.

      Delete
  23. Anonymous13:20

    Very nice.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous14:09

    I guess the Pegasus is in talks as that Turkish airline. But are there any bilateral limitaions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:19

      There are. They can only.fly to/from Turkey and even that is limited to political agreement. But maybe it's Pegasus' planned Romanian AOC.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:12

      When is that supposed to launch?

      Delete
  25. Anonymous14:18

    AMS flights needed

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous14:20

    Maybe Transavia :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:39

      They don't have bases outside Nethetlands and France.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:11

      Pity

      Delete
  27. Anonymous14:37

    So we could expect new routes next year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:39

      Yes

      Delete
    2. Anonymous08:12

      Let's hope, Nothing is guaranteed.

      Delete
  28. Anonymous14:42

    During the first PSO contract from Nis, Air Serbia had 12 destinations. Maybe some of the ones that didn't make the cut for the second PSO contract will be launched by LCC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:49

      Some of them made sense - Nuremberg, Karlsruhe, Ljubljana and some of them were flat out terrible - like Budapest and to lesser extent Rome for example.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:35

      Ljubljana is still operated.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:36

      Budapest was only added to stop Wizz from launching the flights as under PSO rules they would be unable to launch it.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous19:53

      We are all well aware of that, but that was malicious and served no one and no purpose - JU flew empty with 3 or 4 passengers on board and W6 did not start flying, thus preventing citizens from south of Serbia having access to a wide W6 network from BUD.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous08:11

      Well Wizz Air, if it wanted to, could have launched the Budapest route for over 4 years now. It didn't (and all those years before Air Serbia operated flights for 6 months or less).

      Delete
  29. Anonymous14:43

    What about changing management which can't provide new flights? That's Minister's responsibility, not talking with airlines about flights.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous15:34

    Bergamooo, please!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous18:34

    CDG makes most sense for new Air Serbia destination.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:34

      And as for LCC base, Wizz is the obvious choice.

      Delete
  32. Anonymous19:42

    Kad vidiš po komentarima kolko imamo vazduhoplovnih stručnjaka čudim se kako nismo Švajcarska na Balkanu

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous08:10

    Can't wait to see which airline it will be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:59

      At the opening of the airport terminal, they announced subsidies, but now they are only talking about negotiations. Honestly, I don't think any of them will agree to that as long as they keep pouring subsidies into Air Serbia and creates an unnatural competition that the government has implemented at the airport. I wish I am wrong

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.