Croatia Airlines posts €9 million loss amid fleet transition


Croatia Airlines reported mixed financial and operational results for the first nine months of 2024, impacted by an ambitious fleet transition to Airbus A220 aircraft. The substantial costs associated with the fleet upgrade, coupled with inflation and increased operational expenses, resulted in a net loss of nine million euros, a sharp contrast to the 7.1-million-euro profit reported for the same period in 2023. The airline's total revenue reached 206.1 million euros, close to 2023 levels. However, operating expenses rose by 9% to 215.1 million euros due to increased maintenance, leasing, and personnel costs. Croatia Airlines engaged in additional short-term leases to cover maintenance schedules, which, combined with inflationary pressures, led to an 11.6 million euro increase in operating costs.

Among the factors contributing to the airline’s increased costs was maintenance, where expenses grew by 8% to 33.9 million euros, primarily due to the transition of aircraft types and the operational challenges of managing two different fleet types during the transition. Additional aircraft leasing was necessary to maintain service reliability, adding to the overall expense. Passenger and airport service costs increased by 7%, reaching 44 million euros, attributed to increased passenger numbers, higher airport fees, and extended flight schedules. Croatia Airlines implemented a 10% salary increase beginning in April 2023 to offset inflation and attract skilled labour. A new five-year Collective Agreement signed this year further solidified these adjustments, impacting the company’s general and administrative expenses, which increased to 9.6 million euros.

The national carrier achieved growth across most operational metrics from January to September 2024. During the nine-month period, Croatia Airlines handled 1.424.916 passengers, representing an increase of .5.5% on last year, or an additional 74.679 travellers. However, the figure is still down 16.2% on the pre-pandemic 2019 or 276.655 fewer travellers. During the first three quarters of 2024, the carrier welcomed 1.046.208 passengers on international flights, up 6.9% year-on-year and 333.096 customers on domestic services, an improvement of 6.3% The remaining 45.612 passengers were handled on charters, down 21.7%. The average cabin load factor stood at 64.7%, down 1.2 points on last year and 9.1 points below 2019 levels.

Looking ahead, Croatia Airlines anticipates a period of financial stabilisation once the A220 fleet is fully operational, projecting lower maintenance and fuel costs. The increased passenger capacity and lower operating costs of the A220 are expected to improve profitability in the medium term. Additionally, the company’s expanded network and improved service offerings, such as digital boarding tools, baggage tracking, and in-flight e-media options, are anticipated to drive customer satisfaction and loyalty.



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Again the same, old story.

    OU in red.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Actually this is a new story. They were always profitable after summer, not this year.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:06

      That's a big concern

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:56

      Operating expenses up 9% and a net loss of 9 million euros is no small number! I hope the airline can recover, but it seems like they underestimated how costly this transition would be. Maybe more gradual implementation could have helped manage costs better?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:35

      Jasmin is a legend, 9 million euros is nothing for airline like OU!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:18

      How did you go bankrupt?
      At first very slowly and then suddenly...

      E. Hemingway The sun also rises

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Croatia Airlines is so far behind 2019 levels that it is worrying. Almost 20% less passenger or more than quarter of a million fewer passengers, load factor down almost 10% on 2019. Crazy. And all this on a market that has record traffic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      They will never reach 2019 levels simply because now they have FR which is constantly attacking them. I give OU 2, 3 years before they collapse and declare bankruptcy.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:10

      Plenkovic promised they will always get money from the Government.

      Nice EU rules.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:44

      You really have to be a genius to achieve these results with all the resources/coastline Croatia has.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous13:57

      Passenger numbers are up (Y-O-Y), but their cabin load factor actually dropped. This could be a sign of overcapacity or poor route planning. Hopefully, the A220s allow them to optimize routes and improve efficiency without wasting seats

      Delete
    5. Anonymous15:14

      They are losing DH8 so they will be actually in much worse situation effiency wise flying only with A220.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous01:03

      Plus they will have to pay for wet leases of turboprop aircraft.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:04

    In reality 2023 is shaping to be a disaster for OU. Ryanair is eating them alive and with such catastrophic financial results I don't see them doing well at the end of the year.

    If they lost €9 million after summer then we can expect the loss at the end of the year to be close to €20 million. Costs have gone up, revenue flatlined and Ryanair keeps on growing their network out of ZAG.

    Quo vadis OU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:26

      They have 80 million in the bank so they can sustain losses. Plus the gov will give them money too. The only way they will fail is if they get sold badly like Adria did.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:35

      Anon 09:26.....only me believe you, trust me!

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:09

    Many Airlines are still under 2019 passenger levels. Ryanair have done a lot of damage in Croatia, like other countries that they try and sneak into. I admire Serbia protecting their national carrier from Irish invasion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Yes, our lifes would be miserable without Ou

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:12

      The issue is, Croatia Airlines hasn't event attempted to compete against Ryanair in Zagreb in any possible way.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:14

      In Serbia the national airline has had to compete against Wizz Air long before Croatia Airlines had to compete against Ryanair in Zagreb. The difference being is that they actually do something to compete against them. They attack each others' routes, lower fares in an attempt to push the other out etc. In Zagreb, Croatia Airlines couldn't care less, not to mention that they directly compete only on 2 routes.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:15

      Why would they? They will anyhow get the money from Plenkovic.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:53

      Yes, you're right. They'll get the money until they don't.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:15

    Last year profit came from the effects of the sale-leaseback agreement (Airbus fleet was sold and leased back), so 2023 result is not comparable to 2024. The profit in 2023 included the effect of this transaction (calculated as the difference between the book value of the aircraft and engines and the discounted value of the "assets with the right of use", calculated on the basis of the total contracted fixed obligations until the end of the lease, as provisioned by the international accounting standards).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      So, it means they were always in red.

      Only last year creative accounting helped them to present the situation otherwise.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:19

      The comparison to 2019 is not good either. In Q1-Q3 they had net loss of 6 million. Now it is 9.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:19

    And they told us the magic starts when the A220 arrives...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      This is the magic.

      They managed to make a loss during the time of the year when all the other companies make profit.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:25

      They’re putting everything on the promise of the A220, but what if it doesn’t deliver the savings they’re expecting? This is a risky gamble, and it doesn’t seem like they have a solid backup plan.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:22

    Bravo Hrvatska!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous09:23

    So it's official. OU will have a loss at the end of the year. Now we will just see how big the minus will be in Q4.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21

      Hardly surprising

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:24

    They need to focus more on Zagreb, transform it into a mini hub. Only way they can increase passenger numbers and revenue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      +1 and only way they can offset competition from FR.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous15:13

      no they need to copy Vueling and easy jet in costal cites and Ryan in Zagreb. Story with hub is long gone especially now when Croatia enter schengen zone

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:24

    Worrying

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:06

      Worrying trends at this company started many years ago. The fact that it still has a fleet of 12-13 aircraft says a lot

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:36

    Who would have thought.....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous09:43

    Q4 is always bad so a yearly loss could amount to €15 million

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous09:44

    As predicted

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous09:45

    Let someone take over for OU to realize its full potential.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      Or just get a new professional management.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous01:07

      ^ that would make a change. Pity the government never tried it

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:57

      Take over exactly what and at which price?
      The airplanes? Those are leased.
      Administration? That player would have enough of its own.
      Cabin Crew? Hardly.
      Pilots? Perhaps.
      Technical support? Yes.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:49

    They need to operate more charters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      +100

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:07

      Too late. There are direct flights from everywhere in Europe to Summer destinations. Unless they start charters from Asia which they don't have airplanes for.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous02:06

      True

      Delete
  16. Anonymous09:50

    What is the passenger yield, based on revenue passenger kilometers?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous09:50

    Can someone predict what are realistic and possible outcomes for OU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      The will stay alive as long as the government wants and can/may support them covering the losses.

      According to me, the best would be what Malta did with Malta airlines that went bankrupt, just for KM Malta airlines to be opened the day after taking over the planes, employees, lines and leaving the losses behind. Until v.3 comes in 10-15 years.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:33

      From this year Croatia Airlines eligible again for state funds if they undertake restructuring. I am quite sure that in a year or two they will announce restructuring process. Last time it did not bring any results. We will see about this time.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:25

      Hrvatska saka u hrvatskom slajpiku.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous08:39

      OU got the latest government bailout in 2019. According to EU rules you can give a bailout every ten years. I don't know where the info comes from that they can get a bailout this year. In reality its 2029, so i really have no idea how they want to make it until then. And if they try anything shady, i am sure the Ryanair lawyers will eat them alive. Its time to face the reality. Bankruptcy.

      Delete
  18. notLufthansa09:57

    Default, sale to Mutti, end of ops (just to name three)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:18

      None of these will happen, but thanks for your paranoia.

      Delete
    2. notLufthansa09:38

      No paranoia my friend, when OU will end at least ine whole year with no loss (from operationas, not sale of assets, state aid etc), then there wuuld be room for optimism

      Delete
  19. Anonymous10:02

    Since the fleet transition will take until 2027, are they telling us all the years in between will be loss making?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:36

      When they have a larger fleet of A220s, one would assume all these magical savings they have announced will start.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:35

      They’re sinking money into the fleet while their load factor is dropping and expenses keep rising. Maybe focus on filling seats first before splurging on a whole new fleet

      Delete
  20. Anonymous10:03

    They should fly to warmer destinations in winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:08

      They barely fly anywhere in winter.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:04

      And whom would they fly there?

      Delete
  21. Anonymous10:04

    This just proves how bad the management is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:09

      Jasmin? Are you sure?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:07

      Are you sure? He coauthored a 700 page book with a list of references being half of it.
      And names that presided over this slow motion catastrophe, such as Mišetić and Tatalović also signed it.

      Delete
  22. Anonymous10:49

    Complete basket case of an airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:08

      It's a slow motion catastrophe

      Delete
  23. Anonymous10:56

    I find these results worrying, especially the lag on 2019.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous11:31

    The passenger numbers and LF really need to be improved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:56

      The prices are too high. It's a stupid policy that they have. All prices are always too high.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous02:03

      You would think with high prices they would be making more money.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:10

      Easyer said than done.
      They can never beat carries whom they feed and who are serving the same market. They just don't get the same fares (tariff vise) to compete.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:15

      OU's strategy is the same as the one of Adria Airways before its demise - 3x more expensive ticket prices on average vs comparable legacy carrier flights. This is akin to pitching the nose up in a stall situation, actually it is counter-intuitive, but you pitch the nose down in to regain lift. It seems to be in order to lower the angle of attack, OU must re-establishing lift by doing something different to nose up/ prices up

      Delete
  25. Anonymous11:31

    Things are only going to get worse as Ryanair expands in Zagreb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:04

      I think Ryanair is almost irrelevant. Croatia Airlines flies the same number of flights as before and it has more or less the same number of passengers. The problem is that costs are now higher because of the stupid decision to get the A220. And everyone else is growing while Croatia Airlines is not.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous20:08

      I would not say 16.2% less passengers is more or less the same.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous01:27

      This loss is tough to see, but new planes could make a difference. If they can get through this period, I think they’ll be in a better position

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:12

      Really? How? Do what you're proposing is that the most common aircraft type A320, is somehow not good. It's the industry standard

      Delete
  26. Anonymous11:33

    Well this is the only quarter where they usually make money, so this is disappointing. Some radical changes needed at OU.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous11:35

    Thank you for the balanced and detailed summary of their financial results. Appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous12:00

    Didn't they hire some consulting company couple of years ago to help them turn around and become profitable? What happened with that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:08

      You are really a funny guy!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:12

      Not a joke, they really did. What was the name of that consulting company?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:27

      It's called BCG (Boston Consulting Group) and they threw money at it. Same as money was thrown at two different privatization advisors in last 10 years that delivered no results.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous01:05

      BCG advised them to get A220s I guess. But what I can't get is any company advising OU to get rid of its Dashes and then propose to them to wet lease the planes. In fact I have never head of this. What will they do? Wet lease turboprops until infinity?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:46

      Just look at OS. Very stupid decision to get rid of all Dashes and soon after that they are now wet leasing more and more ATRs. And OS is a lot bigger than OU.

      Delete
  29. Anonymous12:02

    We are talking about all the increased costs. But what about biggest cost for carriers, fuel? Fuel was down this year compering it to last year, so they saved significant amout there. Ooohh they are in trouble, big trouble.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:41

      +100 exactly. They conveniently forgot to mention that

      Delete
  30. Anonymous12:09

    Winter is coming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:19

      Disaster is comming

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:15

      It will be a winter of discontent to take a literary figure

      Delete
  31. Anonymous12:28

    I really hope things turn around soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:56

      I’m happy to see they’re investing in digital tools like boarding and baggage tracking. As a frequent flyer, these small improvements really add up in the overall experience. Here’s hoping these changes attract more passengers and help them get back to profitability

      Delete
  32. Anonymous13:49

    It’s understandable that costs would increase during such a big shift, but I’m optimistic that the A220 will pay off for them in the long run with better fuel efficiency and lower maintenance costs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vlad15:04

      Fuel efficiency and lower maintenance costs mean nothing if your route network is crap and you have no revenue management strategy.

      Delete
  33. Anonymous16:24

    Honestly, this looks like poor planning. Croatia Airlines is taking on massive expenses for this fleet upgrade at a time when inflation and operational costs are already high. Did they really think they could handle all this at once?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:35

      Agree. If their goal was to stay competitive, they’re going about it the wrong way. With these huge losses and rising expenses, Croatia Airlines might end up pricing themselves out of the market if they don’t turn things around soon.

      Delete
  34. Anonymous16:25

    They’re expanding the fleet when they haven’t even recovered pre-pandemic demand levels. Seems misguided to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:33

      +1
      Croatia Airlines should have slowed down and been more strategic. It seems they’re just bleeding money with no immediate end in sight. The A220 might help in the long run, but they’re digging themselves into a hole now

      Delete
  35. Anonymous16:55

    I'm sorry but I think Croatia Airlines is the only airline in the world that is banking their whole turnaround on savings produced by a plane. It shows just how desperate they are. If demand doesn’t pick up soon, those savings won’t matter much if they’re not filling seats and the best indicator of that is the poor load factor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:02

      They have nothing else to say. They have no strategy.

      Delete
  36. Anonymous17:33

    Report says "substantial costs associated with the fleet upgrade" affected financial results. So far Croatia added only one A220 to the fleet. Will they even survive adding another 14 A220s?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:41

      Well it makes sense. The costs associated with adding A220 included engine purchase, equipment purchase, crew training. They didn't do that all for one aircraft.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous20:12

      The didn't pay 100% of all that for the whole batch of 15 aircraft upfront.

      Delete
  37. Anonymous17:50

    U Croatiji ništa novo, nesposobna uprava radi gubitke, a Plenković plaća koliko god treba.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:10

      +1

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:12

      kao sto je Milanovic platio prija njega

      Delete
  38. Anonymous20:01

    Unfortunately Croatia Airlines is following pretty fast the dead end as recently happens to CSA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:27

      Let’s be fair – it’s not just Croatia Airlines; airlines everywhere are facing challenges with costs and competition. I hope they manage to get back on their feet soon

      Delete
  39. Anonymous01:10

    And the two worst quarters are yet to come

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anonymous01:26

    With Ryanair, Croatia Airlines needs to rethink its strategy if it wants to survive. Otherwise, it’s just going to be an endless cycle of losses.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous01:28

    It feels like every year we hear about losses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous02:03

      They were profitable last year, which you would have noticed if you read the second sentence.

      Delete
  42. Anonymous13:11

    Ryanair's profits have dropped rather significantly according to the News this morning. So it shows all Airlines are struggling!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.