NEWS FLASH
Comments
Post a Comment
EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.
Disaster. Analitičar said that long-haul must have at least 90% load factor! :)
ReplyDeleteJako loše.
Delete75% is awful. But a least a little better than OU.
DeleteI wouldn't say it's "awful". You have to keep in mind that first few flights in direction from Croatia to Canada, and the last few flights in direction from Canada to Croatia are not full because most people use this route for leisure/holiday travel. They buy packages through Air Transat. And I would ignore statements made by that self proclaimed expert. Load factor mean very little. It is yield that matters.
Delete1431,what are you, obsessed?
DeleteThat is bad . TS is not doing well in general . They kept discounting the airfare to fill up their flights to ZAG and they did ok there as many people took advance to their low pricing? However TS lost lots of money Wondering is CRO gouvermant is still substitute thahat route?
DeleteBravo Hrvatska!
ReplyDeleteLaunch Montreal now
ReplyDeleteGreat!
ReplyDeleteWell these numbers only show that if ZAG can have 34 000 pax seasonaly, BEG can also accomplish the same if not even more. So YU probably knows this and the question is when will they choose to start flying to Toronto, even if it is seasonal only?
ReplyDeleteIt's not about loads but about yields. Air Transat and Air Serbia have different cost structures, not to mention that one is based in Canada.
DeleteAir Serbia cost structure seems lower than Air Transat's. On top of that, two weekly seasonal won't satisfy demand so route would be capacity constrained from the start, and capacity contrained usually means higher yield. Would not be surprised to see Air Serbia announce Toronto in 2025.
Delete